 |
A Partnership to Improve Urban Education
| |
| | Unformatted Document Text:
Section I: Content
A. Statement of the issue.
AACTE has selected the focus “Creating New Visions for Teacher Preparation” because of the urgent need to improve both teacher preparation and school quality. Problems in these areas are most acute when teacher preparation and teacher quality intersect in urban and rural schools that serve large populations of low-income, minority students. Improvements in either teacher preparation or school quality are impossible to sustain without improving the other. Efforts to improve teacher preparation and school quality are rarely linked, and when they are, they often fail because true partnerships between teacher preparation programs and schools are rarely established. Even when partnerships between preparation programs and schools are established, gains are difficult to sustain because partnerships do not embrace business and civic groups, all elements of the higher education community, and district and state education agencies in ways that build on the strengths and interests of these parties. The proposed roundtable discussion builds on the experience of one teacher preparation program’s partnership program designed to involve all players in an urban community to improve student achievement at an inner-city high school and middle school while also better preparing future and experienced teachers to work in these settings.
The call for new visions for teacher preparation is in response to a number of issues. First, there is a lack of confidence in traditional teacher preparation, especially in its ability to prepare teachers to teach in urban and rural schools. Second, few models exist for sustained interaction between teacher preparation programs and public schools, resulting in mismatches between goals and values of the two institutions, and often leaving too many new teachers with little support. Third innovations in school structure and governance (e.g., turnaround schools, takeovers, charters) are occurring which have an impact on the context in which we prepare teachers and on the expectations of teachers. Finally, community resources are underutilized and our candidates don’t know how to identify and access resources. All of these issues put us in a position to examine teacher preparation in light of new alliances.
To create new visions we need to broaden our alliances and cut down on the separation of teacher preparation from P-12 schools, other departments on IHE campuses, and the business and civic community. Partnering with all of these entities in an effort to serve failing schools, we are able to better serve the students in the schools, provide innovative opportunities for pre-service and in-service teachers, and connect entities that typically play a marginal role in this process in a meaningful way. In addition, we give candidates an opportunity to see beyond traditional preparation and traditional school structures.
B. Literature review.
The literature clearly supports efforts to link improvements in teacher preparation with efforts to improve schools. The recently released report from the Joint Task Force for Urban/Metropolitan Schools (American Association of State Colleges and Universities & National Association of State Universities and State Land-Grant Colleges (AASCU & NASUSLGC), 2004) provides a concise call for all members of higher education and K-
1
|
| | Authors: Finnan, Christine. and Welch, Frances. |
|
| |
|
|
Section I: Content
A. Statement of the issue.
AACTE has selected the focus “Creating New Visions for Teacher Preparation” because of the urgent need to improve both teacher preparation and school quality. Problems in these areas are most acute when teacher preparation and teacher quality intersect in urban and rural schools that serve large populations of low-income, minority students. Improvements in either teacher preparation or school quality are impossible to sustain without improving the other. Efforts to improve teacher preparation and school quality are rarely linked, and when they are, they often fail because true partnerships between teacher preparation programs and schools are rarely established. Even when partnerships between preparation programs and schools are established, gains are difficult to sustain because partnerships do not embrace business and civic groups, all elements of the higher education community, and district and state education agencies in ways that build on the strengths and interests of these parties. The proposed roundtable discussion builds on the experience of one teacher preparation program’s partnership program designed to involve all players in an urban community to improve student achievement at an inner-city high school and middle school while also better preparing future and experienced teachers to work in these settings.
The call for new visions for teacher preparation is in response to a number of issues. First, there is a lack of confidence in traditional teacher preparation, especially in its ability to prepare teachers to teach in urban and rural schools. Second, few models exist for sustained interaction between teacher preparation programs and public schools, resulting in mismatches between goals and values of the two institutions, and often leaving too many new teachers with little support. Third innovations in school structure and governance (e.g., turnaround schools, takeovers, charters) are occurring which have an impact on the context in which we prepare teachers and on the expectations of teachers. Finally, community resources are underutilized and our candidates don’t know how to identify and access resources. All of these issues put us in a position to examine teacher preparation in light of new alliances.
To create new visions we need to broaden our alliances and cut down on the separation of teacher preparation from P-12 schools, other departments on IHE campuses, and the business and civic community. Partnering with all of these entities in an effort to serve failing schools, we are able to better serve the students in the schools, provide innovative opportunities for pre-service and in-service teachers, and connect entities that typically play a marginal role in this process in a meaningful way. In addition, we give candidates an opportunity to see beyond traditional preparation and traditional school structures.
B. Literature review.
The literature clearly supports efforts to link improvements in teacher preparation with efforts to improve schools. The recently released report from the Joint Task Force for Urban/Metropolitan Schools (American Association of State Colleges and Universities & National Association of State Universities and State Land-Grant Colleges (AASCU & NASUSLGC), 2004) provides a concise call for all members of higher education and K-
1
|
|
Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! | | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. | | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! | | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! | | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. | | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! | | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|