|
|
|
|
The Impact of Gender on the 2004 Presidential Election |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
During the 1990s, the gender gap in voting became fairly pronounced and seemingly permanent in voting in national elections in the United States. Since 2000, however, the changed security situation after September 11th and the intensification of partisan conflict over cultural issues combined to change the dynamics underlying the gender gap to a significant extent. The gender gap vanished in the 2002 congressional elections before bouncing back in 2004 to a level about half that in the 1996 and 2000 elections. The analysis in this paper suggests that this reduction in the gender gap in voting can be explained by two distinct factors. First, growing concerns and fears about security issues affected women considerably more than men, creating cross pressures on the voting decisions of women that reduced their support of Democratic candidates. Second, central issues in the “culture wars” affected men more than women, thereby undercutting the previous positive contribution to the gender gap that women’s greater liberalism on these issues had produced. Despite these effects, the gender gap continued to be found among a wide range of demographic groups, indicating that gender per se remains a significant factor in American politics. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
women (215), gender (190), gap (181), men (139), vote (128), issu (98), polit (76), effect (65), posit (61), 2004 (55), differ (51), cultur (49), war (45), support (44), tabl (42), percentag (41), point (41), clark (38), pressur (37), cross (37), chang (36), |
Author's Keywords:
|
gender gap, 2004 presidential elections, security issues, social issues, economic issues |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Clark, Caleb. and Clark, Janet. "The Impact of Gender on the 2004 Presidential Election" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41245_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Clark, C. M. and Clark, J. , 2005-09-01 "The Impact of Gender on the 2004 Presidential Election" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p41245_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: During the 1990s, the gender gap in voting became fairly pronounced and seemingly permanent in voting in national elections in the United States. Since 2000, however, the changed security situation after September 11th and the intensification of partisan conflict over cultural issues combined to change the dynamics underlying the gender gap to a significant extent. The gender gap vanished in the 2002 congressional elections before bouncing back in 2004 to a level about half that in the 1996 and 2000 elections. The analysis in this paper suggests that this reduction in the gender gap in voting can be explained by two distinct factors. First, growing concerns and fears about security issues affected women considerably more than men, creating cross pressures on the voting decisions of women that reduced their support of Democratic candidates. Second, central issues in the “culture wars” affected men more than women, thereby undercutting the previous positive contribution to the gender gap that women’s greater liberalism on these issues had produced. Despite these effects, the gender gap continued to be found among a wide range of demographic groups, indicating that gender per se remains a significant factor in American politics. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
65 |
| Word count: |
10565 |
| Text sample: |
| THE GENDER GAP IN 2004: THE EMERGENCE OF CROSS PRESSURES? Cal Clark Auburn University Janet Clark State University of West Georgia Prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Washington 2 D.C. September 1-4 2005. The Agender gap @ in which women vote for Democratic candidates to a significantly greater extent than men do seemingly became a permanent feature of the political landscape in the United States during the last two decades of the |
| Quarterly 63: 62-89. Welch Susan and John Hibbing. 1992. AFinancial Conditions Gender and Voting in American National Elections.@ Journal of Politics 54: 197-214. Whirls Daniel. 1986. AReinterpreting the Gender Gap.@ Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 316-330. Wilcox Clyde Joseph Ferrara and Dee Allsop. 1993. AGroup Differences in Early Support for Military Action in the Gulf: The Effects of Gender Generation and Ethnicity.@ American Politics Quarterly 21: 343-359. Wolfe Alan. 1998. One Nation After All: What Middle-Class Americans Really Think about |
Similar Titles:
Gender Differentiation and Cross-Cultural Variations in Measures of Psychological Political Engagement:The Role of Interviewer Effects
Political Culture, Cross-Pressures and Non-Voting
Gender Differences in Partisan Support Among Independent Voters in the 2000, 2004 and 2008 Presidential Elections
|
|