All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"It's Nothing Personal but…": Individual vs. Contextual Determinants of Support for Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe
Unformatted Document Text:  RESEARCH DESIGN In order to investigate the propositions stated above, three separate Eurobarometers from 1988, 1994 and 2000 are pooled together to examine the variation among individuals as well as between countries and years. 8 In addition to the cross-sectional survey data, annual socioeconomic and political data was collected for the years 1987 to 1988, 1993 to 1994, and 1999 to 2000 to examine contextual factors and cross-level effects. The dependent variable is expressed support, “if a general election were held tomorrow,” for a party that is identified as explicitly associated with the anti-immigrant issue. 9 This definition of the extreme-right anti- immigrant (ERAI) parties means that the dependent variable is a categorical variable. A low number of respondents were classified as ERAI supporters, in the pooled sample (n=40,968), 1.94 percent expressed support for ERAI parties. In order to test the grievance intensification arguments, both individual and contextual variables were used. At the individual level, the variable of most interest is the type of opposition being articulated. Is an increasing level of one type of grievance orientation more strongly linked to support for an anti-immigrant party than another? The two different types of grievances against immigrants, identity-based and interest-based, are constructed using additive scales. Identity-based grievances are measured using three different questions in each Eurobarometer in which respondents are asked if they agree with statements about having immigrants as neighbors, as relations, and how far immigrant children undermine the educational quality. 10 Interest-based grievances are also measured with three questions that ask whether respondents agree that immigrants exploit the social welfare system, increase unemployment, and increase crime. The contextual variables selected to examine the grievance intensification thesis focus on the socioeconomic environment that is most likely to increase individuals’ grievances against immigrants. Specifically, we measure declining socioeconomic conditions and rising foreign population levels, as well as more diffuse, non- experiential measures, such as an increase in the numbers of asylum seekers. 11 The unemployment rate from the year prior to the administration of the Eurobarometer survey is a socioeconomic measure. Visibility of immigrants is measured by the percentage of the population that are non-EU nationals in each country. 12 In addition, the natural logarithm of the number of asylum seekers is included as an indirect measure of the perceived “threat” of increasing numbers of immigrants. The political opportunity thesis is tested by variables measuring the ideological environment in which the parties are operating. Based on the preceding discussion the conditions we expect to be conducive to mobilising 13

Authors: Gibson, Rachel. and Swenson, Tami.
first   previous   Page 13 of 31   next   last



background image
RESEARCH DESIGN
In order to investigate the propositions stated above, three separate Eurobarometers from 1988, 1994 and
2000 are pooled together to examine the variation among individuals as well as between countries and years.
In
addition to the cross-sectional survey data, annual socioeconomic and political data was collected for the years
1987 to 1988, 1993 to 1994, and 1999 to 2000 to examine contextual factors and cross-level effects.
The dependent variable is expressed support, “if a general election were held tomorrow,” for a party that
is identified as explicitly associated with the anti-immigrant issue.
This definition of the extreme-right anti-
immigrant (ERAI) parties means that the dependent variable is a categorical variable. A low number of
respondents were classified as ERAI supporters, in the pooled sample (n=40,968), 1.94 percent expressed support
for ERAI parties.
In order to test the grievance intensification arguments, both individual and contextual variables were
used. At the individual level, the variable of most interest is the type of opposition being articulated. Is an
increasing level of one type of grievance orientation more strongly linked to support for an anti-immigrant party
than another? The two different types of grievances against immigrants, identity-based and interest-based, are
constructed using additive scales. Identity-based grievances are measured using three different questions in each
Eurobarometer in which respondents are asked if they agree with statements about having immigrants as
neighbors, as relations, and how far immigrant children undermine the educational quality.
Interest-based
grievances are also measured with three questions that ask whether respondents agree that immigrants exploit the
social welfare system, increase unemployment, and increase crime.
The contextual variables selected to examine the grievance intensification thesis focus on the
socioeconomic environment that is most likely to increase individuals’ grievances against immigrants. Specifically,
we measure declining socioeconomic conditions and rising foreign population levels, as well as more diffuse, non-
experiential measures, such as an increase in the numbers of asylum seekers.
The unemployment rate from the
year prior to the administration of the Eurobarometer survey is a socioeconomic measure. Visibility of immigrants
is measured by the percentage of the population that are non-EU nationals in each country.
In addition, the
natural logarithm of the number of asylum seekers is included as an indirect measure of the perceived “threat” of
increasing numbers of immigrants.
The political opportunity thesis is tested by variables measuring the ideological environment in which the
parties are operating. Based on the preceding discussion the conditions we expect to be conducive to mobilising
13


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 13 of 31   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.