Citation

Ingroup Derogation and the Norm of Racial Pride. Divergence of Implicit and Explicit Racial Affect Measures

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Ingroup favoritism is frequently assumed to represent a natural predisposition (e.g., in social identity theory, Tajfel & Turner 1979, or by the realistic group conflict approach, Sidanius 1993, Bobo 2000). Yet, social psychological research also finds evidence of ingroup derogation. The most prominent example of negative affect towards an ingroup was recorded in 1939 by Mamie and Kenneth B. Clark (1947) using their now famous “Dolls Test”. In this test African American children were asked to pick their favorite doll from a choice of otherwise identical black and white dolls. A disturbingly high percentage of these African American children indicated a preference for the white dolls. The researchers interpreted this as a rejection of the children’s own African American identity. In the mid-1960s, social psychological research registered a change in African American feelings towards their own group under the slogan “Black is Beautiful” (Hraba & Grant 1970). The Clarks expressed doubts about this evidence and interpreted these findings as reflecting “a new norm of racial pride rather than internalized self esteem” (Clark 1963, 1988, p. 247). In this paper, the question is investigated whether ingroup derogating attitudes may persist on the subconscious level among young African Americans.

This study applies a modern version of the ‘Dolls Test’ using a laboratory-based priming procedure (Fazio’s et al. 1995) to measure racial affect among college students of various racial and ethnic backgrounds. Subconscious affective responses towards portraits of black and white individuals are compared based on reaction time measures. The results indicate a substantial disconnect between explicit and implicit feelings. Members of all groups significantly overstate affect towards their respective ingroup and understate affect towards outgroups. In addition a general pro-white and anti-black bias can be observed on the subconscious level that is reminiscent of the old racial Norm of White Supremacy. Surprisingly, this distortion is particularly pronounced among African American participants. These findings are consistent with the Clark’s (1988) hypothesis that pro-black pronouncements on the part of young African Americans may reflect a “norm of racial pride” rather than genuine pro-black affect. The paper raises the question whether subconscious anti-black attitudes may contribute to the disproportional incidence of violence that is directed against African American victims according to data compiled by the FBI (2001). Future research will be required to answer this question.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

black (145), white (145), american (130), african (108), doll (85), racial (84), prime (78), clark (74), p (57), group (55), tabl (55), 2 (50), n (49), victim (47), may (47), result (46), attitud (45), implicit (44), one (41), ingroup (41), particip (38),

Author's Keywords:

Implicit Attitudes, Racial Resentment, Priming, Ingroup Derogation, Ingroup Favoritism, Black-on-Black violence
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42076_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Craemer, Thomas. "Ingroup Derogation and the Norm of Racial Pride. Divergence of Implicit and Explicit Racial Affect Measures" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42076_index.html>

APA Citation:

Craemer, T. , 2005-09-01 "Ingroup Derogation and the Norm of Racial Pride. Divergence of Implicit and Explicit Racial Affect Measures" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42076_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Ingroup favoritism is frequently assumed to represent a natural predisposition (e.g., in social identity theory, Tajfel & Turner 1979, or by the realistic group conflict approach, Sidanius 1993, Bobo 2000). Yet, social psychological research also finds evidence of ingroup derogation. The most prominent example of negative affect towards an ingroup was recorded in 1939 by Mamie and Kenneth B. Clark (1947) using their now famous “Dolls Test”. In this test African American children were asked to pick their favorite doll from a choice of otherwise identical black and white dolls. A disturbingly high percentage of these African American children indicated a preference for the white dolls. The researchers interpreted this as a rejection of the children’s own African American identity. In the mid-1960s, social psychological research registered a change in African American feelings towards their own group under the slogan “Black is Beautiful” (Hraba & Grant 1970). The Clarks expressed doubts about this evidence and interpreted these findings as reflecting “a new norm of racial pride rather than internalized self esteem” (Clark 1963, 1988, p. 247). In this paper, the question is investigated whether ingroup derogating attitudes may persist on the subconscious level among young African Americans.

This study applies a modern version of the ‘Dolls Test’ using a laboratory-based priming procedure (Fazio’s et al. 1995) to measure racial affect among college students of various racial and ethnic backgrounds. Subconscious affective responses towards portraits of black and white individuals are compared based on reaction time measures. The results indicate a substantial disconnect between explicit and implicit feelings. Members of all groups significantly overstate affect towards their respective ingroup and understate affect towards outgroups. In addition a general pro-white and anti-black bias can be observed on the subconscious level that is reminiscent of the old racial Norm of White Supremacy. Surprisingly, this distortion is particularly pronounced among African American participants. These findings are consistent with the Clark’s (1988) hypothesis that pro-black pronouncements on the part of young African Americans may reflect a “norm of racial pride” rather than genuine pro-black affect. The paper raises the question whether subconscious anti-black attitudes may contribute to the disproportional incidence of violence that is directed against African American victims according to data compiled by the FBI (2001). Future research will be required to answer this question.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 25
Word count: 10459
Text sample:
Ingroup Derogation and the Norm of Racial Pride Divergence of Implicit and Explicit Racial Attitudes Thomas Craemer Department of Political Science Stony Brook University Stony Brook NY 11794-4392 tcraemer@ic.sunysb.edu August 30 2005 This paper was prepared for presentation as a poster at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association Washington DC September 2005. Abstract. Ingroup favoritism is frequently assumed to represent a natural predisposition (e.g. in social identity theory Tajfel & Turner 1979 or by the realistic
N3 pp. 226-254. Sidanius Jim (1993): The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression. A Social Dominance Perspective. In S. Iyengar and W. J. McGuire (eds.): Durham: Duke University Press. Tajfel Henri and Turner John C. (1979): An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (eds): The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey CA: Brooks/Cole. Wilson Amos N. (1990): Black-On-Black Violence. The Psychodynamics of Black Self-Annihilation in Service of White Domination. New


Similar Titles:
Intra-racial Differences in an Increasingly Inter-racial World: Native-born Black American and African and Afro-Caribbean Interests in Government and Participation in the U.S.

Racial Affect among African Americans and Non-African Americans. An Implicit "Dolls Test"


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.