Citation

Rights and Wrongs Without God: A Non-Religious Grounding for Human Rights in a Pluralistic World

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

In this paper, I put forward what I take to be a plausible non-religious foundation for the idea of human rights. In particular, I make a procedural and practical argument here, one that steps back from arguments about a universal human nature. To do so, I look to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to claim that human rights represent a political consensus of overlapping ideas from cultures and communities around the world. It is not simply that no single tradition was victorious in setting out the foundation of human rights that others could accept, though it is true that none was; instead, the Declaration’s chief virtue is that everyone was able to agree upon and endorse a common foundation: the dignity of the human person. The nations of the world may disagree on a great many things – philosophical as well as practical – but they have all agreed on this important point: every human being is entitled to the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration by virtue of the inherent dignity that is common to us all. This idea can be embraced by those who subscribe to what Michael Perry calls a religious cosmology and also by those who do not. In constructing this consensus, then, we have succeeded in establishing a practical non-religious foundation upon which the idea of human rights can rest.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

right (233), human (218), univers (68), one (58), declar (57), idea (54), consensus (52), argu (47), perri (42), digniti (42), polit (41), cultur (39), world (38), ibid (37), religi (37), concept (34), peopl (33), argument (33), point (33), reason (33), note (28),

Author's Keywords:

Human Rights
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42089_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Kohen, Ari. "Rights and Wrongs Without God: A Non-Religious Grounding for Human Rights in a Pluralistic World" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42089_index.html>

APA Citation:

Kohen, A. , 2005-09-01 "Rights and Wrongs Without God: A Non-Religious Grounding for Human Rights in a Pluralistic World" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42089_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: In this paper, I put forward what I take to be a plausible non-religious foundation for the idea of human rights. In particular, I make a procedural and practical argument here, one that steps back from arguments about a universal human nature. To do so, I look to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to claim that human rights represent a political consensus of overlapping ideas from cultures and communities around the world. It is not simply that no single tradition was victorious in setting out the foundation of human rights that others could accept, though it is true that none was; instead, the Declaration’s chief virtue is that everyone was able to agree upon and endorse a common foundation: the dignity of the human person. The nations of the world may disagree on a great many things – philosophical as well as practical – but they have all agreed on this important point: every human being is entitled to the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration by virtue of the inherent dignity that is common to us all. This idea can be embraced by those who subscribe to what Michael Perry calls a religious cosmology and also by those who do not. In constructing this consensus, then, we have succeeded in establishing a practical non-religious foundation upon which the idea of human rights can rest.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 37
Word count: 12987
Text sample:
Rights and Wrongs Without God: A Non-Religious Grounding for Human Rights in a Pluralistic World In this paper I offer a persuasive refutation of one of the central claims in Michael J. Perry’s The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries. He argues in the first chapter of that book that “There is no intelligible (much less persuasive) secular version of the conviction that every human being is sacred; the only intelligible versions are religious…The conviction that every human being
will oppose them a common project can move forward without agreement on the reasons for those positions.”89 While we might not all agree on the reason behind the reason at bottom we have all agreed that human beings possess dignity and that by virtue of this fact they are inviolable; this idea can be embraced by those who subscribe to what Perry calls a religious cosmology and also by 87 Rawls Political Liberalism 153 citation omitted. 88 Glendon 77


Similar Titles:
Justifying Human Rights and Stabilizing Democracy Under Conditions of Cultural Diversity: The Idea for an Overlapping Consensus on Dialogue

The Contentious Politics of Women’s Human Rights: Religious and Cultural Challenges to Women’s Equality in the International Arena.

Mythologizing the “Legal Personality”: The Convergence of Human Dignity and the Rule of Law within the Universal Declaration of Human Rights


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.