Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42101_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Krueger, James. "Marriage Frames: The Gate-Keepers of Public Opinion on Gay and Lesbian Political Rights?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42101_index.html>

Krueger, J. , 2005-09-01 "Marriage Frames: The Gate-Keepers of Public Opinion on Gay and Lesbian Political Rights?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC Online <PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42101_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper examines the effect of question-order and different justification frames on opposition to civil unions and same-sex marriage and marriage�s potential priming effect on the issues of fair job and housing practices, gays in the military, and the broader protection of civil rights for gays and lesbians. It provides a greater understanding of how the public views the debates over same-sex marriage as well as its impact on other facets of the gay rights movement. The experimental design follows Kinder and Sanders� (1990) survey-experiment which used alternate opposition frames and an extensive battery of follow up questions to test the attitudes of whites toward affirmative action. Six hundred respondents are randomly assigned into �against my religion,� �traditional definition,� or �no frame� treatments, and answer two questions: if the respondent supports or opposes civil unions, and if the respondent supports or opposes same-sex marriage. Respondents in all conditions then receive follow up questions relating to other gay and lesbian rights. By varying both the treatment received and the question order, this experiment follows a three by two design. While respondents are drawn from the undergraduate population of the University of Iowa, the number of respondents should provide a large enough n for each of the six categories to act as a pilot for larger studies to be conducted in the future.

Gay Civil Rights v. Religious Privileges: Bible Belt Religion and Politics Before and After Important Legal and Religious Decisions

Does Order Really Make a Difference? The Impact of Respondent and Question Characteristics on Response Option Order Effects

Race and Ethnic Differences in Religious Based Political Behavior: Is the Religious Right Just Another Political Interest Group?