|
|
|
|
Democratizing Global Governance: Stakeholder Democracy at the World Summit for Sustainable Development |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
One of the most pressing problems confronting political scientists today is: can global governance have a democratic basis? Picking up one potentially important response, and drawing on original analysis of the World Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannesburg (WSSD) in 2002, this paper constructs and defends an ideal-typical model of a new approach to democracy - ‘stakeholder democracy’. In this way, it explores and theorizes stakeholder governance practices and speculates on their uses and the extent of their democratic character. This work is located in the context of the changing vocabulary and practice of global governance, in which concerns about legitimacy, accountability, transparency and participation have loomed increasingly large in recent years. Sustainability and environmental protection is an arena in which innovative experiments with new hybrid, pluri-lateral forms of governance, along with the incorporation of a transnational civil society spanning the public-private divide, are taking place. The paper highlights certain dilemmas confronting efforts to democratize global environmental governance in light of innovative practices at the WSSD. Our central argument is that the WSSD, with all its caveats and limitations, can rightly be seen as exemplifying new deliberative stakeholder practices with general democratic potential at the global level. In examining these arrangements, we draw together the nascent elements of this new ‘model’, such as its distinctive takes on principles of inclusion and deliberation of so-called major groups (NGOs, business, youth, women, unions, farmers, science, indigenous peoples, and local government). We take stock of interactive stakeholder forums/dialogues and partnership agreements, which institutionalized relationships between state and non-state actors before and after the Summit. Potential objections to the stakeholder model arising from liberal-reformist, cosmopolitan and critical perspectives on democratizing global environmental governance are pinpointed, and responses are offered. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
stakehold (193), govern (167), global (145), repres (89), democraci (89), group (89), environment (77), democrat (75), state (63), particip (56), develop (52), dialogu (52), major (51), polit (51), 2002 (50), model (50), wssd (49), societi (49), sustain (48), process (47), partnership (47), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Backstrand, Karin. and Saward, Michael. "Democratizing Global Governance: Stakeholder Democracy at the World Summit for Sustainable Development" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p58974_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Backstrand, K. and Saward, M. , 2004-09-02 "Democratizing Global Governance: Stakeholder Democracy at the World Summit for Sustainable Development" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p58974_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: One of the most pressing problems confronting political scientists today is: can global governance have a democratic basis? Picking up one potentially important response, and drawing on original analysis of the World Summit for Sustainable Development in Johannesburg (WSSD) in 2002, this paper constructs and defends an ideal-typical model of a new approach to democracy - ‘stakeholder democracy’. In this way, it explores and theorizes stakeholder governance practices and speculates on their uses and the extent of their democratic character. This work is located in the context of the changing vocabulary and practice of global governance, in which concerns about legitimacy, accountability, transparency and participation have loomed increasingly large in recent years. Sustainability and environmental protection is an arena in which innovative experiments with new hybrid, pluri-lateral forms of governance, along with the incorporation of a transnational civil society spanning the public-private divide, are taking place. The paper highlights certain dilemmas confronting efforts to democratize global environmental governance in light of innovative practices at the WSSD. Our central argument is that the WSSD, with all its caveats and limitations, can rightly be seen as exemplifying new deliberative stakeholder practices with general democratic potential at the global level. In examining these arrangements, we draw together the nascent elements of this new ‘model’, such as its distinctive takes on principles of inclusion and deliberation of so-called major groups (NGOs, business, youth, women, unions, farmers, science, indigenous peoples, and local government). We take stock of interactive stakeholder forums/dialogues and partnership agreements, which institutionalized relationships between state and non-state actors before and after the Summit. Potential objections to the stakeholder model arising from liberal-reformist, cosmopolitan and critical perspectives on democratizing global environmental governance are pinpointed, and responses are offered. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
31 |
| Word count: |
12541 |
| Text sample: |
| 1 Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy at the World Summit for Sustainable Development Karin Bäckstrand Michael Saward Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences Lund University Open University Paper for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association September 2-5 2004. Copyright by the American Political Science Association 2 Abstract One of the most pressing problems confronting political scientists today is: can global governance have a democratic basis? Picking up one potentially important response |
| Development. Report of the Secretary General E/CN.17/2004/16. New York Commission for Sustainable Development. Vogler J. (2003). "Taking Institutions Seriously: How Regime Analysis Can be Relevant to Multilevel Environmental Governance." Global Environmental Politics 3(2): 25-39. Wapner P. (1996). Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany State University of New York Press. Wilkinson R. (2002). The Contours of Courtship: the WTO and Civil society. Global Governance. Critical Perspectives. R. Wilkinson and S. Hughes. London and New York Routledge. Young I. M. |
Similar Titles:
Grafting participatory governance onto representative democracy and existing state institutions: Explaining outcomes via political society and civil society lenses
Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit for Sustainable Development
State Supreme Courts and the Political Environment:How Interest Group Participation Influences State Policy-Making
|
|