|
|
|
|
Water Resource Management Policy and the Globalization of Inequity |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper is based on ongoing fieldwork in Ambovombe-Androy Madagascar, one of four countries (with Kenya, Israel, and the U.S.) in this study, looking at who gets to make decisions about water resources and why. International water policy norms have followed broader natural resource governance norms in advocating decentralization while augmenting community participation. This southern Madagascar makes clear that this is no panacea. The process, embraced by both the Malagasy government and international donors, is increasing water scarcity in the region while exacerbating the north-south economic gap. The finding here is that the political decentralization associated with resource management localization has led to a disengagement of the state, its economic resources, and its management capacity. Rural communities are suddenly faced with having to pay exorbitant costs for water. They are ill-prepared to carry out their municipal functions and unable to raise the level of user-fees or community taxes necessary to fund infrastructure development. Further, communities themselves are diverse even within the region and the universal model for local institutional strengthening is not appropriate in all cases. As a result, systems are neither complex nor adaptive and decision-making at the local level is limited to market opportunities at hand. Donor-funded projects funded support “appropriate” technologies that prop up unsustainable water delivery markets and mine water without possibility of creating a sustainable resource resolve. The result is the concomitant manufacturing of economic hardship and water resource scarcity. A new, more nuanced view of state responsibilities and community participation that ensures both resource perpetuation and not just participation but viable choices by community members is now overdue. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
water (204), communiti (92), resourc (80), manag (79), level (56), state (54), need (47), local (44), ambovomb (44), commune (41), develop (41), govern (39), institut (36), ae (34), madagascar (30), world (30), decentr (29), one (29), particip (28), sustain (27), bank (26), |
Author's Keywords:
|
water, decentralization, Africa, natural resource management, Madagascar |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Marcus, Richard. "Water Resource Management Policy and the Globalization of Inequity" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p58976_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Marcus, R. , 2004-09-02 "Water Resource Management Policy and the Globalization of Inequity" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p58976_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper is based on ongoing fieldwork in Ambovombe-Androy Madagascar, one of four countries (with Kenya, Israel, and the U.S.) in this study, looking at who gets to make decisions about water resources and why. International water policy norms have followed broader natural resource governance norms in advocating decentralization while augmenting community participation. This southern Madagascar makes clear that this is no panacea. The process, embraced by both the Malagasy government and international donors, is increasing water scarcity in the region while exacerbating the north-south economic gap. The finding here is that the political decentralization associated with resource management localization has led to a disengagement of the state, its economic resources, and its management capacity. Rural communities are suddenly faced with having to pay exorbitant costs for water. They are ill-prepared to carry out their municipal functions and unable to raise the level of user-fees or community taxes necessary to fund infrastructure development. Further, communities themselves are diverse even within the region and the universal model for local institutional strengthening is not appropriate in all cases. As a result, systems are neither complex nor adaptive and decision-making at the local level is limited to market opportunities at hand. Donor-funded projects funded support “appropriate” technologies that prop up unsustainable water delivery markets and mine water without possibility of creating a sustainable resource resolve. The result is the concomitant manufacturing of economic hardship and water resource scarcity. A new, more nuanced view of state responsibilities and community participation that ensures both resource perpetuation and not just participation but viable choices by community members is now overdue. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
22 |
| Word count: |
10958 |
| Text sample: |
| Water Resource Management Policy and the Globalization of Inequity: The Case of Ambovombe-Androy Madagascar1 Richard R. Marcus Assistant Professor Department of Political Science The University of Alabama in Huntsville marcusr@uah.edu Paper prepared for the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago IL September 2-5 2004. Please do not cite without permission from the author. Comments are appreciated. 1 This case is one of four in this study (with cases from Kenya Israel and the U.S.). The |
| water sector performance. Washington DC: World Bank. Scott James C (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press. World Bank (2000). The world development report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press. UNEP (2002). Africa environmental outlook:past present and future perspectives. New York: UNEP. U.S. Agency for International Development/RESOLVE. (2004) "Evaluation et perspectives des transferts de gestion des ressources naturelles à Madagascar. Rapport Final Phase 1." Unpublished report |
Similar Titles:
Farm Household Needs Assessment and Government Policy: Integrating Local Values into State-Driven Water Quality Remediation Efforts
Cities and Natural Resources in an Urban World: The Political Development of Water Privatization in the United States
Cities and Natural Resources in an Urban World: The Political Development of Water Privatization in the United States
|
|