All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

Occupation Politics: American Interests and the Struggle over Health Insurance in Postwar Japan
Unformatted Document Text:  Japanese doctors also had misgivings about health policy reform, especially under a nationalized health system. However, during this early period of the occupation, before the reestablishment of the Japan Medical Association as a professional organization under the aegis of the occupation in 1948, doctors did not play a central role in policy debates either (Nomura 1976: 56). This expert consensus around universal health care and the relative weakness of reform opponents in Japan stands in stark contrast to the constellation of interests involved in debates over national health insurance going on at the time in the United States. In May 1947, Senator James Murray (Democrat-Montana) introduced Senate bill 1320, the National Health Insurance and Public Health Act, co-sponsored with Senator Robert Wagner (Democrat-New York). Like the previous two Wagner-Murray bills in the Senate, the centerpiece of S. 1320 was a system of national health insurance financed by payroll taxes to cover the health care needs of all Americans. By design, the bill’s sponsors scheduled its introduction on the same day President Harry S. Truman issued his second special message to Congress calling for a program of national health insurance (Poen 1979: 100). Echoing his 1945 health care message Truman wrote, “Every American should have the right to adequate medical care and to adequate protection from the economic threat of sickness,” adding that, “National health insurance is the most effective single way to meet the Nation’s health needs” (Truman 1947: 250-2). Two weeks later, Senator Robert A. Taft (Republican-Ohio), presidential aspirant and Chair of the Senate Labor and Public Welfare Committee began hearings on S. 1320. Immediately, the debate over national health insurance became an opening salvo in the upcoming 1948 presidential campaign. As Monte Poen (1979: 102) writes, “with the 15

Authors: Yamagishi, Takakazu.
first   previous   Page 15 of 43   next   last



background image
Japanese doctors also had misgivings about health policy reform, especially under a
nationalized health system. However, during this early period of the occupation, before
the reestablishment of the Japan Medical Association as a professional organization
under the aegis of the occupation in 1948, doctors did not play a central role in policy
debates either (Nomura 1976: 56).
This expert consensus around universal health care and the relative weakness of
reform opponents in Japan stands in stark contrast to the constellation of interests
involved in debates over national health insurance going on at the time in the United
States. In May 1947, Senator James Murray (Democrat-Montana) introduced Senate bill
1320, the National Health Insurance and Public Health Act, co-sponsored with Senator
Robert Wagner (Democrat-New York). Like the previous two Wagner-Murray bills in
the Senate, the centerpiece of S. 1320 was a system of national health insurance financed
by payroll taxes to cover the health care needs of all Americans. By design, the bill’s
sponsors scheduled its introduction on the same day President Harry S. Truman issued his
second special message to Congress calling for a program of national health insurance
(Poen 1979: 100). Echoing his 1945 health care message Truman wrote, “Every
American should have the right to adequate medical care and to adequate protection from
the economic threat of sickness,” adding that, “National health insurance is the most
effective single way to meet the Nation’s health needs” (Truman 1947: 250-2).
Two weeks later, Senator Robert A. Taft (Republican-Ohio), presidential aspirant
and Chair of the Senate Labor and Public Welfare Committee began hearings on S. 1320.
Immediately, the debate over national health insurance became an opening salvo in the
upcoming 1948 presidential campaign. As Monte Poen (1979: 102) writes, “with the
15


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 15 of 43   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.