Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60736_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Celep, Odul. and Paskeviciute, Aida. "Preemptive versus Accommodative Adjustment: Ideological Resemblance Between Established Parties and Extreme Right-wing Parties in Five Advanced Industrialized Democracies, 1945-1998" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60736_index.html>

Celep, O. and Paskeviciute, A. , 2004-09-02 "Preemptive versus Accommodative Adjustment: Ideological Resemblance Between Established Parties and Extreme Right-wing Parties in Five Advanced Industrialized Democracies, 1945-1998" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60736_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Although students of democratic politics believe that right-wing extremism pose a threat to democratic norms and institutions, existing research tells us very little about the consequences of the newly emerged extreme right-wing parties (ERPs) across established democracies. Drawing on party literature and spatial theories of party competition, as well as the empirical data collected as part of the Manifestos Research Group (MRG) project, our study examines how the ERPs have influenced the political agenda of established democracies. Specifically, we argue that the rising electoral strength of the ERPs alone is not a sufficient indicator of right-authoritarianism influence on country’s political discourse. Instead, adjustment strategies by the established parties, such as preemption and accommodation, should be taken account in order to provide a more comprehensive picture of how rising right-wing extremism has structured the political agenda of contemporary democracies.

Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in Twenty-Five Postwar Democracies

Do Parties Adjust Their Policies in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts? Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Postwar Democracies