All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

POLICY SUBSTANCE IN THE PUBLIC MIND: The Issue Structure of Mass Politics
Unformatted Document Text:  40 This raises the question of whether the coefficients for the voting impact of working welfare and national security in 1980, which are statistically significant, are also seriously distorted by the absence of a measure for foreign engagement. The question is not inconsequential, because 1980 is the first of the three successive elections in which national security jumps up hugely as a voting influence, leading social welfare during this period. There is no direct way to address this question, of course, since the relevant measure is just absent. Yet it is possible within a comprehensive issue model to rerun the analysis for the years immediately before and after 1980 without their measure of foreign engagement, in order to see whether the working welfare and national security coefficients change in those years under these altered conditions. Table 4 Table 4 does this, and the answer is, straightforwardly, no. For 1976, the other coefficients are little influenced by the absence of a measure for foreign engagement. Moreover, 1976 is a particularly important year for this test, because foreign engagement does achieve statistical significance. Without it, working welfare appears to pick up a little of the variance in the presidential vote previously explained by foreign engagement, but nothing is otherwise changed; the role of national security is not being distorted by the presence or absence of a second foreign-policy measure. For 1984, where foreign engagement does not begin with a statistically significant impact, differences are truly inconsequential. Apparently, so far as one can judge, the absence of a measure of foreign engagement in 1980 does not produce a misleading analysis in the other domains that are measured.

Authors: Claggett, William. and Shafer, Byron.
first   previous   Page 40 of 70   next   last



background image
40
This raises the question of whether the coefficients for the voting impact of
working welfare and national security in 1980, which are statistically significant, are also
seriously distorted by the absence of a measure for foreign engagement. The question is
not inconsequential, because 1980 is the first of the three successive elections in which
national security jumps up hugely as a voting influence, leading social welfare during this
period. There is no direct way to address this question, of course, since the relevant
measure is just absent. Yet it is possible within a comprehensive issue model to rerun the
analysis for the years immediately before and after 1980 without their measure of foreign
engagement, in order to see whether the working welfare and national security
coefficients change in those years under these altered conditions.
Table 4
Table 4 does this, and the answer is, straightforwardly, no. For 1976, the other
coefficients are little influenced by the absence of a measure for foreign engagement.
Moreover, 1976 is a particularly important year for this test, because foreign engagement
does achieve statistical significance. Without it, working welfare appears to pick up a
little of the variance in the presidential vote previously explained by foreign engagement,
but nothing is otherwise changed; the role of national security is not being distorted by
the presence or absence of a second foreign-policy measure. For 1984, where foreign
engagement does not begin with a statistically significant impact, differences are truly
inconsequential. Apparently, so far as one can judge, the absence of a measure of foreign
engagement in 1980 does not produce a misleading analysis in the other domains that are
measured.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 40 of 70   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.