Author's Keywords: Political humor, Late-night, comedy, elaboration likelihood model	Convention Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60834_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Young, Dannagal. "The Counterargument-Disruption Model of Political Humor (CADIMO): An Experimental Exploration of the Effects of Late-Night Political Jokes on Cognitive Elaboration and the Conditional Effects of Partisanship" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60834_index.html>

Young, D. G. , 2004-09-02 "The Counterargument-Disruption Model of Political Humor (CADIMO): An Experimental Exploration of the Effects of Late-Night Political Jokes on Cognitive Elaboration and the Conditional Effects of Partisanship" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p60834_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper presents an experimental test of the assumptions of the author’s proposed psychological model of political humor effects. The model, referred to as the Counterargument Disruption Model of Political Humor (CADIMO), is a theoretical framework in which to examine the effects of political humor which integrates assumptions of humor’s incongruity mechanism (Suls, 1972), the Elaboration Likelihood Model ( Petty and Cacioppo, 1986), and argument-disruption theory (Festinger and Maccoby, 1964). The primary aspect of the CADIMO addressed in this paper concerns the counterargument disruption mechanism posited to occur in the context of humor, specifically in late-night political humor. The experiment uses a 2 condition within-subjects design on a sample of 59 college undergraduates to test the hypothesis that humorous constructs inhibit cognitive elaboration on message arguments.

When Are Strong Arguments Stronger Than Weak Arguments? Deindividuation Effects on Message Elaboration in CMC

Giving Advice to One’s Boss: How Does Cognitive Elaboration Affect Message Production Process and Message Features?

Taking Comedy Seriously: Political Humor and Cognitive Processing of Political Information