All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

A Bright Future for Bombing? The Prospects for Successful Military Compellence in a New Century
Unformatted Document Text:  Draft – Please do not cite without permission Douglas - 17 collectively addressed this question, offering a premature consensus which does not stand up well to scrutiny. My complaint is made more explicit by using an example. Since Robert Pape’s Bombing to Win is perhaps the best known and most widely cited contemporary scholarly work on air power, it is a natural starting point. Making the choice more appealing, Pape has recently extended his findings from Bombing to Win’s to the host of post-1991 cases. 23 Part of the article’s problems stem from the lack of a well developed theoretical competitor, which naturally leads to stretching inherited categories to cover new phenomena, if for no other reasons than the fact there is no benchmark for comparison. In this sense, Pape and his conclusion may be singled out for proximate criticism, but the far larger portions of the academic community could share in the indirect blame for failing to create a full competitor to Bombing to Win. However, even bearing this point in mind, there is more to criticize in Pape’s recent conclusions than the poor relative fit of some of the categories. In his latest article, Pape comes closer to discussing regime targeting than ever before, making the false promise of decapitation his first major point. As in other settings, the analysis is somewhat skewed by treating decapitation mostly as brute force assassination. Far more importantly, the analysis of effectiveness is skewed by using the same standards whether the war is a coercive one of limited aims or a total one for regime change. Moving to Pape’s more recent conclusions; he writes, “The strategy of enemy decapitation has inherent shortcomings, which precision technology, for all its advantages, cannot overcome. U.S. forces have tried the strategy on six occasions in the past 16 years, and it either failed or backfired every time.” 24 The problems of Pape’s approach become more apparent when moving to a discussion of particular cases. Speaking specifically of Kosovo, Pape lists it as one an instance in which: decapitation tactics have proven downright counterproductive….In March 1999, in an attempt to strong-arm Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic into adopting a more forthcoming policy toward ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, the United States launched what was supposed to be a three-day air campaign against 51 targets in and near Belgrade. Not 23 Robert Pape, “The True Worth of Air Power,” Foreign Affairs (March/April 2004) vol. 83, no. 2, 116-130. 24 Pape, “True Worth of Air Power,” 117.

Authors: Douglas, Frank.
first   previous   Page 18 of 24   next   last



background image
Draft – Please do not cite without permission
Douglas - 17
collectively addressed this question, offering a premature consensus which does not stand up
well to scrutiny.
My complaint is made more explicit by using an example. Since Robert Pape’s Bombing
to Win is perhaps the best known and most widely cited contemporary scholarly work on air
power, it is a natural starting point. Making the choice more appealing, Pape has recently
extended his findings from Bombing to Win’s to the host of post-1991 cases.
23
Part of the
article’s problems stem from the lack of a well developed theoretical competitor, which naturally
leads to stretching inherited categories to cover new phenomena, if for no other reasons than the
fact there is no benchmark for comparison. In this sense, Pape and his conclusion may be
singled out for proximate criticism, but the far larger portions of the academic community could
share in the indirect blame for failing to create a full competitor to Bombing to Win. However,
even bearing this point in mind, there is more to criticize in Pape’s recent conclusions than the
poor relative fit of some of the categories.
In his latest article, Pape comes closer to discussing regime targeting than ever before,
making the false promise of decapitation his first major point. As in other settings, the analysis
is somewhat skewed by treating decapitation mostly as brute force assassination. Far more
importantly, the analysis of effectiveness is skewed by using the same standards whether the war
is a coercive one of limited aims or a total one for regime change.
Moving to Pape’s more recent conclusions; he writes, “The strategy of enemy
decapitation has inherent shortcomings, which precision technology, for all its advantages,
cannot overcome. U.S. forces have tried the strategy on six occasions in the past 16 years, and it
either failed or backfired every time.”
24
The problems of Pape’s approach become more
apparent when moving to a discussion of particular cases. Speaking specifically of Kosovo,
Pape lists it as one an instance in which:
decapitation tactics have proven downright counterproductive….In March 1999, in an
attempt to strong-arm Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic into adopting a more
forthcoming policy toward ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, the United States launched what
was supposed to be a three-day air campaign against 51 targets in and near Belgrade. Not
23
Robert Pape, “The True Worth of Air Power,” Foreign Affairs (March/April 2004) vol. 83, no.
2, 116-130.
24
Pape, “True Worth of Air Power,” 117.


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 18 of 24   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.