Citation

Democracy and Education Spending: Has Africas Move to Multiparty Elections Made a Difference for Policy?

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

While it is widely recognized that electoral competition can have a major influence on public spending decisions, there has been little effort to consider whether the move to multiparty elections in African countries in recent years has led to a redistribution of public expenditures between social groups. This is a question relevant both for debates about African politics and for broader discussions about the effect of democratic institutions on policy outcomes. I develop a hypothesis, illustrated with a simple game-theoretic model, which suggests that the need to obtain an electoral majority may have prompted African governments to devote greater resources to primary schools. I test this proposition using panel data on electoral competition and education spending in thirty-five African countries. The results show that democratization has indeed been associated with greater spending on primary education, and that governments subject to electoral competition have shifted resources towards primary schools, away from other items in the education budget. These findings are robust to controls for unobserved country effects, and they are also supported by evidence from recent country cases.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

educ (175), competit (151), spend (141), countri (105), 1 (104), primari (93), multiparti (91), elect (89), govern (80), 2 (80), elector (76), african (61), polit (58), variabl (53), result (52), parti (51), regress (47), school (46), data (42), expenditur (42), singl (41),
Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.apsanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p63958_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Stasavage, David. "Democracy and Education Spending: Has Africas Move to Multiparty Elections Made a Difference for Policy?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p63958_index.html>

APA Citation:

Stasavage, D. , 2003-08-27 "Democracy and Education Spending: Has Africas Move to Multiparty Elections Made a Difference for Policy?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p63958_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: While it is widely recognized that electoral competition can have a major influence on public spending decisions, there has been little effort to consider whether the move to multiparty elections in African countries in recent years has led to a redistribution of public expenditures between social groups. This is a question relevant both for debates about African politics and for broader discussions about the effect of democratic institutions on policy outcomes. I develop a hypothesis, illustrated with a simple game-theoretic model, which suggests that the need to obtain an electoral majority may have prompted African governments to devote greater resources to primary schools. I test this proposition using panel data on electoral competition and education spending in thirty-five African countries. The results show that democratization has indeed been associated with greater spending on primary education, and that governments subject to electoral competition have shifted resources towards primary schools, away from other items in the education budget. These findings are robust to controls for unobserved country effects, and they are also supported by evidence from recent country cases.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available American Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: .pdf
Page count: 42
Word count: 11969
Text sample:
Democracy and Education Spending: Has Africa’s Move to Multiparty Elections Made a Difference for Policy? David Stasavage London School of Economics May 2003 d.stasavage@lse.ac.uk While it is widely recognized that electoral competition can have a major influence on public spending decisions there has been little effort to consider whether the move to multiparty elections in African countries in recent years has led to a redistribution of public expenditures between social groups. This is a question relevant both for debates
1988- Single Party 90 1992 1984-90 None 1996 Multiparty 1992-96 Multiparty Uganda 1984 Multiparty Guinea 1988-89 1991- None 1987 1989-91 None 92 1994-95 1993-96 Multiparty Zambia 1981-90 Single Party Guinea-Bissau 1987 Single Party 1991-95 Multiparty Zimbabwe 1981-93 Multiparty 41


Similar Titles:
The Effect of the Electoral College on Political Knowledge and Trust-in-Government in Competitive and Non-Competitive States

The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in the 2005 British General Election: Combining Evidence From Campaign Spending, Agent Survey Data and the British Election Study


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.