|
|
|
|
Motivated Information Processing and Negative Campaigns: The Dynamic Formation of Candidate Evaluations |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This research investigated the information selection and processing behavior of potential voters in a dynamic campaign environment. It was hypothesized that voters are subject to a negativity bias (preference for negative information over positive information), a candidate bias (preference for information about the preferred candidate over the opponent), and a congruency bias (preference for positive information about the preferred candidate and negative information about the opponent over negative information about the preferred candidate and positive information about the opponent). The effects of this information search were predicted to lead to biased perceptions of political messages as well as to more polarized candidate evaluations. Participants in this experiment were exposed to quickly changing information in the form of newspaper-style headlines on a dynamic information board. The main results indicate a strong preference for negative information and a lesser bias for information about the preferred candidate. Participants with a strong initial candidate preference, however, showed a disproportionate preference for negative information about the preferred candidate, contradicting the congruency hypothesis. We found support for a candidate bias in the perception of messages and the polarization of candidate evaluations. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
inform (255), candid (255), negat (203), prefer (162), bias (143), headlin (128), process (125), chang (114), particip (113), posit (106), polit (104), messag (94), select (85), initi (79), effect (76), p (76), evalu (76), 1 (71), valenc (70), motiv (70), 2 (69), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Meffert, Michael., Chung, Sungeun., Joiner, Amber., Garst, Jennifer. and Waks, Leah. "Motivated Information Processing and Negative Campaigns: The Dynamic Formation of Candidate Evaluations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2009-05-27 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66201_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Meffert, M. F., Chung, S. , Joiner, A. , Garst, J. and Waks, L. , 2002-08-28 "Motivated Information Processing and Negative Campaigns: The Dynamic Formation of Candidate Evaluations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-27 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66201_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This research investigated the information selection and processing behavior of potential voters in a dynamic campaign environment. It was hypothesized that voters are subject to a negativity bias (preference for negative information over positive information), a candidate bias (preference for information about the preferred candidate over the opponent), and a congruency bias (preference for positive information about the preferred candidate and negative information about the opponent over negative information about the preferred candidate and positive information about the opponent). The effects of this information search were predicted to lead to biased perceptions of political messages as well as to more polarized candidate evaluations. Participants in this experiment were exposed to quickly changing information in the form of newspaper-style headlines on a dynamic information board. The main results indicate a strong preference for negative information and a lesser bias for information about the preferred candidate. Participants with a strong initial candidate preference, however, showed a disproportionate preference for negative information about the preferred candidate, contradicting the congruency hypothesis. We found support for a candidate bias in the perception of messages and the polarization of candidate evaluations. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
41 |
| Word count: |
13998 |
| Text sample: |
| Motivated Information Processing 1 Motivated Information Processing and Negative Campaigns: The Dynamic Formation of Candidate Evaluations 1 Michael F. Meffert Sungeun Chung Amber Joiner Jennifer Garst and Leah Waks University of Maryland College Park Contact Information: Michael F. Meffert Department of Communication 2130 Skinner Building University of Maryland College Park MD 207427635 Phone: 3014056533 Fax: 3013149471 mmeffert@wam.umd.edu Paper prepared for presentation at the 2002 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association Boston August 29 -- September 1 2002. |
| Time of Evaluation Headline Candidate Initial Final d p < Initial Final d p < Own 70.73 (12.01) 73.30 (16.18) 0.38 .11 70.91 (11.42) 75.98 (12.87) 0.72 .01 Other 46.53 (16.06) 39.43 (20.14) 0.84 .01 51.48 (17.61) 38.68 (19.16) 1.63 .001 d = 2.49 2.32 2.17 2.95 p < .001 .001 .001 .001 2way interaction: F(1 73) = 11.61 p < .01 partial ? 2 = .14 F(1 67) = 42.79 p < .001 partial ? 2 = .39 |
Similar Titles:
Heuristic and Systematic Biased Processing of Political Messages: Effects of Candidate Preference and the Level of Interest in Politics on Attitudes toward Issues
The Negativity Bias and The Effect of Policy Change on Evaluations of Political Incumbents
|
|