|
|
|
|
The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interest Groups: Patterns of Interest Group Contributions |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Interest groups are policy maximizers, while political parties are seat maximizers. These competing goals have important implications for the relationship between interest groups and parties. In this paper I develop an argument concerning the patterns of hard money contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs) to candidates for the U.S. Congress. I argue that interest groups have preferences as to which party gets majority control of each of the chambers of Congress, which leads them to direct --sincere'' and electorally useful money to this party (i.e. labor groups prefer Democrats, corporate groups prefer Republicans). When interest groups donate funds to the --other'' party, the donations are designed to have as minimal electoral impact as possible. Interest groups accomplish this by giving --strategic'' donations to this party in the following way: donate less money, later in the cycle, almost exclusively to incumbents. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
group (133), parti (129), donat (111), interest (84), republican (75), democrat (71), elect (67), pac (67), candid (60), money (58), 1 (43), vote (41), seat (37), incumb (32), prefer (31), member (29), polit (28), cycl (28), one (27), challeng (26), support (26), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Political Science Association URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Brunell, Thomas. "The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interest Groups: Patterns of Interest Group Contributions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66453_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Brunell, T. L. , 2002-08-28 "The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interest Groups: Patterns of Interest Group Contributions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66453_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Interest groups are policy maximizers, while political parties are seat maximizers. These competing goals have important implications for the relationship between interest groups and parties. In this paper I develop an argument concerning the patterns of hard money contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs) to candidates for the U.S. Congress. I argue that interest groups have preferences as to which party gets majority control of each of the chambers of Congress, which leads them to direct --sincere'' and electorally useful money to this party (i.e. labor groups prefer Democrats, corporate groups prefer Republicans). When interest groups donate funds to the --other'' party, the donations are designed to have as minimal electoral impact as possible. Interest groups accomplish this by giving --strategic'' donations to this party in the following way: donate less money, later in the cycle, almost exclusively to incumbents. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
27 |
| Word count: |
7468 |
| Text sample: |
| The Relationship Between Political Parties and Interest Groups: Patterns of Interest Group Contributions Thomas L. Brunell Department of Political Science Binghamton University Binghamton NY 139026000 brunell@binghamton.edu August 22 2002 Abstract Interest groups are policy maximizers while political parties are seat maximizers. These competing goals have important implications for the relationship between interest groups and parties. In this paper I develop an argument concerning the patterns of hard money contributions from Political Action Committees (PACs) to candidates for the U.S. |
| 252.2 3.18 + Entries are the average number of days prior to the general election that a donation was made to the two political parties. Data from the detailed files from the FEC 199596 elec tion cycle and include the top seven corpo rate PACs by overall total donations. Dif ference of means ttest: p<.05 Table 11: Top Labor PACs: Average Number of Days Prior to Election that Donations were Made by Party + Party N Mean Std. Err. |
Similar Titles:
Political Parties and Elections: A Comparative Examination of the Republican and Democrat Party in Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana
Political Parties, Self Perceived Qualifications and Political Ambition: Examining the Role Of Sex In The Candidate Emergence Process For Open U.S. House Seats
|
|