Author's Keywords: Supreme Court, Journalists, Black press, Hispanic press, Mainstream press, University of Michigan affirmative action cases	Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: Southern Political Science Association URL: http://www.spsa.net
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p67268_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Towner, Terri., Clawson, Rosalee. and Waltenburg, Eric. "Interviewing Journalists: Media Coverage of the Michigan Affirmative Action Decisions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Inter-Continental Hotel, New Orleans, LA, Jan 06, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p67268_index.html>

Towner, T. L., Clawson, R. and Waltenburg, E. N. , 2005-01-06 "Interviewing Journalists: Media Coverage of the Michigan Affirmative Action Decisions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Inter-Continental Hotel, New Orleans, LA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p67268_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The U.S. Supreme Court regularly articulates policies of profound political and social consequence. Rarely, however, does the Court take a significant or active role in the broad dissemination of those policies to the mass public. Indeed, where spokespeople for the executive branch or members of Congress often appear publicly to make the case for a given policy or action, the Court simply delivers its opinion and then leaves it to others to communicate it (see, for example, Franklin and Kosaki 1995). As a result, the Court’s policies are extremely vulnerable to the framing effects of the media — no small matter, inasmuch as media frames have a significant bearing on the public’s opinion formation towards the Court’s policies (Clawson and Waltenburg 2003).

Computer-Assisted Qualitative Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the U.S. Mainstream and Chinese Immigrant News Coverage on Social Change Issues: A Case Study

Full Court Press: An Examination of Media Coverage of State Supreme Courts

Where Is My Issue? The Influence of News Coverage and Personal Issue Importance on Subsequent Information Selection on the Web