Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p70861_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Giegerich, Bastian. and Pushkina, Darya. "External Responses to the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP): Russia and the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p70861_index.html>

Giegerich, B. and Pushkina, D. , 2005-03-05 "External Responses to the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP): Russia and the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p70861_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In 1999 the European Union (EU) launched its European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) in an effort to increase the collective civilian and military crisis management capabilities at the Union's disposal. For the EU-US relationship, ESDP has been a persistent issue of contempt over the last five years. The EU-Russia relationship did not seem to be affected in this way. This paper sets out to answer the following question: why have the major non-EU players in European security - Russia and the United States - reacted to the ESDP initiative in the way they did? To explain and analyze the differences, we will proceed in four steps. First, we will address the question of ESDP's purpose and dynamic. Second, we will turn to the American response to ESDP and analyze how it has developed from the Clinton administration to the presidential election in the fall of 2004. Third, we will examine Russian policy towards ESDP since 1999. Finally, we will conclude by outlining several general determinants of the American and Russian responses to ESDP suggested by the preceding analysis.

'Private Regulation' and Public Policy: Non-State Market-Based Governance in Perspective

Industrial Policy and Competition in Developing Countries: From the Regulatory State Model to New Governance in Economic Development

The Dynamics of Delegated Authority: The European Commission, Member States and European Union State Aid Policy