|
|
|
|
Tackling Non-Military Threats by Non-State Actors |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
|
Abstract:
|
The experience of governmental efforts to address non-military transnational threats has demonstrated the limitations of exclusively using interstate means to address these problems. On the other hand, the traditional use of the term NGOs is too crude and unsystematic. The term has to be more differentiated and structured, and the analytical focus has to be expanded to other actors of the private sphere. In this expanded analytical framework, non-state actors such as private business and industry (also private military companies in the realm of security studies), NGOs that are not primarily considered as part of the 'good' civil societies, rebel and guerilla groups and even terrorists have also to be considered. This extended inclusion of non-state actors creates new possibilities of active partnerships between (and selective exclusion of) public and private actors and expands the analytical tools of this cooperation. It allows the analysis of the conditions for the success of private-public partnership by specifically targeting the actors and tools of choice such as the inclusion of the small arms producing and exporting industry to mark and keep records of their weapons or of the banking and insurance industry to cooperate with law enforcement in tackling illicit activities, or the exclusion such as terrorists by freezing their financial assets. This paper tries to assess the conditions under which these kinds of relationship can emerge and when they are successful. It will be argued that selective incentives and sanctions can increase the effectiveness of these partnerships and change the behavior of the targeted actors, if the measures are designed and implemented in a manner that reflects the goals they are attempting to achieve and the preferences and vulnerabilities of the specific actors they are trying to influence. |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Brem, Stefan. "Tackling Non-Military Threats by Non-State Actors" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p71187_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Brem, S. , 2005-03-05 "Tackling Non-Military Threats by Non-State Actors" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p71187_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: The experience of governmental efforts to address non-military transnational threats has demonstrated the limitations of exclusively using interstate means to address these problems. On the other hand, the traditional use of the term NGOs is too crude and unsystematic. The term has to be more differentiated and structured, and the analytical focus has to be expanded to other actors of the private sphere. In this expanded analytical framework, non-state actors such as private business and industry (also private military companies in the realm of security studies), NGOs that are not primarily considered as part of the 'good' civil societies, rebel and guerilla groups and even terrorists have also to be considered. This extended inclusion of non-state actors creates new possibilities of active partnerships between (and selective exclusion of) public and private actors and expands the analytical tools of this cooperation. It allows the analysis of the conditions for the success of private-public partnership by specifically targeting the actors and tools of choice such as the inclusion of the small arms producing and exporting industry to mark and keep records of their weapons or of the banking and insurance industry to cooperate with law enforcement in tackling illicit activities, or the exclusion such as terrorists by freezing their financial assets. This paper tries to assess the conditions under which these kinds of relationship can emerge and when they are successful. It will be argued that selective incentives and sanctions can increase the effectiveness of these partnerships and change the behavior of the targeted actors, if the measures are designed and implemented in a manner that reflects the goals they are attempting to achieve and the preferences and vulnerabilities of the specific actors they are trying to influence. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
Similar Titles:
Reality Matters: Modality Analysis of Cover Images of of Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report
Evolving Public Attitudes to Military Conflict Over Time: The Wisconsin Public Looks at War in Iraq
Iraq and the "Fox Effect": An Examination of Polarizing Media and Public Support for International Conflict
Conflict, Media, and the Impact of
Public Opinion: An Irish, British, Arab, Istraeli and American
Perspective
|
|