|
|
|
|
Teaching and Research in International Politics: Surveying Trends in Faculty Opinion and Publishing |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
In this paper we present initial results from a survey of over 1000 IR faculty in the United States that was conducted in late 2004. We also describe trends in IR publications from a sample of journal articles in the leading IR journals.
Teaching and Research in International Politics: Trends over the Past Two Decades Over the past 25 years the international system has undergone a drastic shift from a bipolar world characterized by a Cold War between two superpowers to a system with a single great power and a wide range of new issues on the agenda. Transnational issues, such as drug trafficking, the spread of infectious disease and terrorism increasingly top the agendas of foreign policy makers. On the one hand, globalization appears to be making the world a smaller place, characterized by increased economic interdependence and information transfers. On the other hand, intrastate and regional violence has destroyed many states, leading to questions about the very notion of sovereignty. Given these substantial changes over the past few decades, have research and teaching in international relations (IR) changed significantly in response to global events? Do the paradigms that defined the field after World War II still dominate scholarly work and teaching in IR? In this study we undertake the first systematic quantitative analysis of IR research and teaching among American scholars. Our paper thus compares what we preach (research) with what we teach (pedagogy in the classroom). We code articles published in the top ten IR and political science journals from 1980-2003. In an effort to shed empirical light on a debate thus far characterized by mostly heat (see Legro, Moravscik, Vasquez, Mearsheimer, Smith). Our investigation assesses which prominent paradigms and epistemologies have been employed over time in the field's major journals. Despite the numerous (and reasonable) claims that social constructivism has made a real impact on the field of IR, no previous study has attempted to provide systematic evidence that could verify this claim. We do. In addition, we code for methods used, regions and subjects under study, level of analysis, efforts at paradigmatic synthesis, and the interest in the role of norms and ideas in IR scholarship. In short, we paint a picture of the field over the past two decades. We compare these trends with results from extensive survey of IR professors teaching undergraduate courses in American colleges and universities over the same time period. This study is the first step toward the construction of the most extensive database on IR teaching and research among American political scientists. Michael Tierney Assistant Professor Department of Government College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187 mjtier@wm..edu ph (757) 221 3039 fx (757) 221 1868 Jennifer Keister Graduate Student Department of Political Science UC San Diego James Long Graduate Student School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Doug McNamara Director of Program on Project Level Aid Database Morton Hall College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187 dbmcna@wm.edu ph (757) 221 5478 |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
articl (179), ir (178), research (115), intern (106), journal (92), paradigm (89), 1 (80), variabl (75), scholar (71), polit (69), polici (69), year (68), code (66), 0 (65), relat (61), use (59), teach (56), studi (55), graph (53), number (50), liber (50), |
Author's Keywords:
|
survey, history of international relations, quantitative, trends, IR, TRIP, paradigm, teaching, policy oriented, methodology, epistemology |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Tierney, Michael., Long, James., Peterson, Sue. and Maliniak, Daniel. "Teaching and Research in International Politics: Surveying Trends in Faculty Opinion and Publishing" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p71444_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Tierney, M. J., Long, J. D., Peterson, S. and Maliniak, D. , 2005-03-05 "Teaching and Research in International Politics: Surveying Trends in Faculty Opinion and Publishing" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Hilton Hawaiian Village, Honolulu, Hawaii Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p71444_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In this paper we present initial results from a survey of over 1000 IR faculty in the United States that was conducted in late 2004. We also describe trends in IR publications from a sample of journal articles in the leading IR journals.
Teaching and Research in International Politics: Trends over the Past Two Decades Over the past 25 years the international system has undergone a drastic shift from a bipolar world characterized by a Cold War between two superpowers to a system with a single great power and a wide range of new issues on the agenda. Transnational issues, such as drug trafficking, the spread of infectious disease and terrorism increasingly top the agendas of foreign policy makers. On the one hand, globalization appears to be making the world a smaller place, characterized by increased economic interdependence and information transfers. On the other hand, intrastate and regional violence has destroyed many states, leading to questions about the very notion of sovereignty. Given these substantial changes over the past few decades, have research and teaching in international relations (IR) changed significantly in response to global events? Do the paradigms that defined the field after World War II still dominate scholarly work and teaching in IR? In this study we undertake the first systematic quantitative analysis of IR research and teaching among American scholars. Our paper thus compares what we preach (research) with what we teach (pedagogy in the classroom). We code articles published in the top ten IR and political science journals from 1980-2003. In an effort to shed empirical light on a debate thus far characterized by mostly heat (see Legro, Moravscik, Vasquez, Mearsheimer, Smith). Our investigation assesses which prominent paradigms and epistemologies have been employed over time in the field's major journals. Despite the numerous (and reasonable) claims that social constructivism has made a real impact on the field of IR, no previous study has attempted to provide systematic evidence that could verify this claim. We do. In addition, we code for methods used, regions and subjects under study, level of analysis, efforts at paradigmatic synthesis, and the interest in the role of norms and ideas in IR scholarship. In short, we paint a picture of the field over the past two decades. We compare these trends with results from extensive survey of IR professors teaching undergraduate courses in American colleges and universities over the same time period. This study is the first step toward the construction of the most extensive database on IR teaching and research among American political scientists. Michael Tierney Assistant Professor Department of Government College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187 mjtier@wm..edu ph (757) 221 3039 fx (757) 221 1868 Jennifer Keister Graduate Student Department of Political Science UC San Diego James Long Graduate Student School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Doug McNamara Director of Program on Project Level Aid Database Morton Hall College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA 23187 dbmcna@wm.edu ph (757) 221 5478 |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
64 |
| Word count: |
18520 |
| Text sample: |
| Teaching and Research in International Politics: Surveying Trends in Faculty Opinion and Publishing James D. Long University of California San Diego jdlong@ucsd.edu Daniel Maliniak College of William and Mary dxmali@wm.edu Susan Peterson College of William and Mary smpete@wm.edu Michael J. Tierney College of William and Mary mjtier@wm.edu Prepared for 2005 46th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association March 15 Honolulu Hawaii This is a preliminary copy and the should not be cited under any circumstances without the permission |
| Appraising the Field. Boston: MIT University Press. 419-454. Walt Stephen. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Waltz Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading M.A.: Addison Wesley. Weaver Ole. 1998. "The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations." International Organization 52 4 687-727. Wendt Alexander. 1998. Social Theory and International Politics. New York: Cambridge Uni- versity Press. Whitely Richard. 1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. |
Similar Titles:
An Overview of Health Relevant Studies in Public Relations: Analysis of Published Articles in Leading Public Relations Journals
Politics and AIDS: An Emerging Research Agenda in Political Science and International Relations
International Politics and International Relations: Two Strands of Studies Derived from the Curricular Development of International Studies in Japanese Universities
|
|