|
|
|
|
Post-Cold War German Foreign Policy: Kant, Locke, or Hobbes? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
That German foreign policy was constrained by Cold War bipolarity never precluded vigorous debate among German policy makers about the requirements of domestic and European political order. Party politics also contributed to such disputes, but an emergent pattern in the debates over East-West relations and unification is better explained by a constructivist approach that links public order to the way language functions to create rules (and thus rule). This perspective accords an independent role to ideas and to policymakers as political agents, but it also explores constraints on what it was possible to say, and to think, in postwar Germany. In previous rounds of debate, exponents of a Kantian institutional approach to order squared off against Lockeans who emphasized rights and agency. In general, the Kantians (Adenauer, Brandt, and Kohl) prevailed over the Lockeans (Schumacher, Kiesinger, and Lafontaine), resulting in a Germany that built institutions first and asked questions about national rights later. But, can this pattern be expected to continue in the post-Cold War era, or should we prepare ourselves for a reassertion of a Hobbesian world view (characterized by coercion, the issuance of directives, and demands for compliance)? |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
germani (98), order (85), german (82), polici (46), polit (44), european (43), intern (42), debat (35), rule (35), state (33), institut (30), one (29), languag (28), war (28), relat (28), power (26), europ (24), social (23), press (23), would (23), also (23), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Kowert, Paul. and Weber, Katja. "Post-Cold War German Foreign Policy: Kant, Locke, or Hobbes?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Mar 17, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72656_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Kowert, P. A. and Weber, K. , 2004-03-17 "Post-Cold War German Foreign Policy: Kant, Locke, or Hobbes?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p72656_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: That German foreign policy was constrained by Cold War bipolarity never precluded vigorous debate among German policy makers about the requirements of domestic and European political order. Party politics also contributed to such disputes, but an emergent pattern in the debates over East-West relations and unification is better explained by a constructivist approach that links public order to the way language functions to create rules (and thus rule). This perspective accords an independent role to ideas and to policymakers as political agents, but it also explores constraints on what it was possible to say, and to think, in postwar Germany. In previous rounds of debate, exponents of a Kantian institutional approach to order squared off against Lockeans who emphasized rights and agency. In general, the Kantians (Adenauer, Brandt, and Kohl) prevailed over the Lockeans (Schumacher, Kiesinger, and Lafontaine), resulting in a Germany that built institutions first and asked questions about national rights later. But, can this pattern be expected to continue in the post-Cold War era, or should we prepare ourselves for a reassertion of a Hobbesian world view (characterized by coercion, the issuance of directives, and demands for compliance)? |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
30 |
| Word count: |
8238 |
| Text sample: |
| Post-Cold War German Foreign Policy: Kant Locke or Hobbes? Katja Weber Sam Nunn School of International Affairs Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332-0610 and Paul Kowert Department of International Relations Florida International University Miami FL 33199 Abstract: That German foreign policy was constrained by Cold War bipolarity never precluded vigorous debate among German policy makers about the requirements of domestic and European political order. Party politics also contributed to such disputes but an emergent pattern in the debates |
| 1983 161. xviii McAdams 1993 31; Doering-Manteuffel 1983; and Artner 1985. xix Artner 1985 3. xx Drummond 1982 11 99. xxi Drummond 1982 86. xxii http://www.bundeskanzler.de/Reden_.7715.44591/a.htm xxiii http://www.bundesregierung.de/dokumente/Rede/ix_56381.htm xxiv As the Economist (April 7 2001 p.41) explains Schroeder "wants to strengthen the two institutions said to represent pan-European interests: the European Parliament and the European Commission." Also see George Parker "Muscle in Brussels: as Europe meets to agree a constitution disputes over the distribution of power loom large" (Financial |
Similar Titles:
Domestic Influences on International Politics: Global Policy Challenges and the Politics of Europe and the United States
Money Talks, but would it make 'Euro-cents' in Eastern European Languages? - On the Importance of Social Policy in European Integration
|
|