|
|
|
|
What Leads the United States to Recognize Secession? From the Cold War to the Post-Cold War |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper deals with the evolution of the American foreign policy towards unilateral secession from the cold war to the post-cold war. It also produces empirical generalizations about the United States' reaction to secessionist attempts, and general statements concerning the political process leading the US to grant international recognition to secessionist movements. Using a case-oriented research analysis of the secession of Bangladesh, and of Slovenia and Croatia, I demonstrate that the American policy of recognition has evolved over years. Short term power politics during the cold war was the crucial factor undermining the American policy towards secession. Though, the end of the cold war marked a shift in the U.S. policy of recognition. As empirical evidences show, the current unipolar order makes the United States very concerned about regional stability when dealing with secessionist issues. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
recognit (112), state (110), us (84), pakistan (68), secess (65), unit (64), intern (49), polici (45), bangladesh (41), would (39), recogn (39), secessionist (37), polit (37), american (34), croatia (30), republ (30), yugoslav (29), war (29), independ (29), case (28), east (28), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Paquin, Jonathan. "What Leads the United States to Recognize Secession? From the Cold War to the Post-Cold War" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Mar 20, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73677_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Paquin, J. , 2004-03-20 "What Leads the United States to Recognize Secession? From the Cold War to the Post-Cold War" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73677_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper deals with the evolution of the American foreign policy towards unilateral secession from the cold war to the post-cold war. It also produces empirical generalizations about the United States' reaction to secessionist attempts, and general statements concerning the political process leading the US to grant international recognition to secessionist movements. Using a case-oriented research analysis of the secession of Bangladesh, and of Slovenia and Croatia, I demonstrate that the American policy of recognition has evolved over years. Short term power politics during the cold war was the crucial factor undermining the American policy towards secession. Though, the end of the cold war marked a shift in the U.S. policy of recognition. As empirical evidences show, the current unipolar order makes the United States very concerned about regional stability when dealing with secessionist issues. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
30 |
| Word count: |
8339 |
| Text sample: |
| What Leads the United States to Recognize Secession ? ∗ From the Cold War to the Post-Cold War Jonathan Paquin Department of Political Science McGill University jonathan.paquin@mail.mcgill.ca Presented at the International Studies Association Convention 17-20 March 2004 Montreal Quebec Canada. ∗ The author would like to thank Stephen Saideman and Robert Young for their comments on an early version of this paper Amy Cox for linguistic revisions and the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la |
| June 26. Wright Denis 1988. Bangladesh: Origins and Indian Ocean Relations New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Limited. Wood John R. 1981. “Secession : A Comparative Analytical Framework” Canadian Journal of Political Science Vol. 14 No. 1 pp. 107-134. 29 Woodward Susan L. 1995. Balkan Tragedy The Brookings Institution Washington D.C. Young Robert A. 1994a. “How Do Peaceful Secessions Happen?” Canadian Journal of Political Science Vol. 27 No. 4 pp. 773-92. Young Robert A. 1994b. The Breakup of Czechoslovakia Kingston: |
Similar Titles:
Domestic Influences on International Politics: Global Policy Challenges and the Politics of Europe and the United States
Policy Cohesion and Ordinary Politics: The Case of United States Ocean Policy
The United States, the International Criminal Court, and Bilateral Immunity Agreements: Explaining the Resistance of Weak States and Consequences for American Foreign Policy
|
|