Citation

North American Security Perimeter and its Implications for North American Community

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Title: North American Security Perimeter and its Implications for North American Community One of the outcomes of the terrorist attacks of September 11 was the reexamination by Canada, the U.S. and Mexico of their security/border policies. The security concerns prompted the North American countries to adopt Smart Border policies and even consider the idea of a North American Security Perimeter (NASP) as a way of dealing with future security threats (Hristoulas, 2002). However, despite the fact that the idea of a NAPS has begun to float around official circles in Ottawa, Mexico City, and Washington D.C all three countries have yet to elaborate their vision of perimeter and what it would entail. The U.S. called for examination of a NASP right after September 11. President Bush ordered various departments to begin negotiating with Canada and Mexico to ensure increased compatibility of immigration, customs and VISA policies. This paper will examine the concept of North American Security Perimeter and its implications for the idea of a North American community and North American integration. Discussions around the border focus around whether borders in North America should look like a traditional border and operate as a dividing line between countries or whether the physical border should be shifted away from North America. But beyond this vague and ambiguous definition of the perimeter concept, the countries of North America have yet to move on the idea. This paper will first, examine the idea of a NAPS and what it means to each country. Second, this paper will explore barriers associated with moving towards a NASP such as the bilateralism inherent in the trilateral relationship, sovereignty concerns displayed by Canada and Mexico and U.S. unilateral decision-making. Finally, the paper will analyze the implications of perimeter for the idea of a North American community and whether it can lead to the development of a genuine community or whether it will just perpetuate the current asymmetries in the trilateral relationship.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

border (186), secur (128), u.s (86), north (77), mexico (77), integr (70), canada (67), american (61), 2003 (54), polici (54), perimet (53), econom (50), trade (40), smart (35), agreement (33), nafta (30), relationship (30), 9 (29), america (27), would (26), manag (26),
Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Studies Association
URL:
http://www.isanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73870_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Jimenez, Jimena. "North American Security Perimeter and its Implications for North American Community" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Mar 17, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73870_index.html>

APA Citation:

Jimenez, J. M. , 2004-03-17 "North American Security Perimeter and its Implications for North American Community" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Le Centre Sheraton Hotel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p73870_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Title: North American Security Perimeter and its Implications for North American Community One of the outcomes of the terrorist attacks of September 11 was the reexamination by Canada, the U.S. and Mexico of their security/border policies. The security concerns prompted the North American countries to adopt Smart Border policies and even consider the idea of a North American Security Perimeter (NASP) as a way of dealing with future security threats (Hristoulas, 2002). However, despite the fact that the idea of a NAPS has begun to float around official circles in Ottawa, Mexico City, and Washington D.C all three countries have yet to elaborate their vision of perimeter and what it would entail. The U.S. called for examination of a NASP right after September 11. President Bush ordered various departments to begin negotiating with Canada and Mexico to ensure increased compatibility of immigration, customs and VISA policies. This paper will examine the concept of North American Security Perimeter and its implications for the idea of a North American community and North American integration. Discussions around the border focus around whether borders in North America should look like a traditional border and operate as a dividing line between countries or whether the physical border should be shifted away from North America. But beyond this vague and ambiguous definition of the perimeter concept, the countries of North America have yet to move on the idea. This paper will first, examine the idea of a NAPS and what it means to each country. Second, this paper will explore barriers associated with moving towards a NASP such as the bilateralism inherent in the trilateral relationship, sovereignty concerns displayed by Canada and Mexico and U.S. unilateral decision-making. Finally, the paper will analyze the implications of perimeter for the idea of a North American community and whether it can lead to the development of a genuine community or whether it will just perpetuate the current asymmetries in the trilateral relationship.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Associated Document Available International Studies Association

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 21
Word count: 8649
Text sample:
North American Security Perimeter & Its Implications for the North American Integration Project Jimena Jimenez Carleton University Paper presented for the 45th Annual ISA Convention Montreal Quebec March 17-20 2004 DRAFT: Please do not cite without permission of the author. Your thoughts and recommendations are welcome. 1 Introduction Sometime after the inception of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) both governmental actors in official circles and academics business and civil society groups in non official circles began
and Trade. In The Conference Board of Canada. United States. Department of Justice. 2000. Semiannual Report to Congress. http:www.usdoj.gov/oig/semiannual/0900/inspect.htm United States. Office of the Press Secretary. 2002. US-Canadian program designed to improve cross border security. 19 http://bulktransporter.com/ar/transportation_uscanadian_program_designed/ United States. Office of the Press Secretary. 2001. North American Leaders’ Statement. http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rls/rm/2001/2482.htm Wendt Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it”. International Organization. 46:2: 391- 20 21


Similar Titles:
Explaining Divergence in Foreign Policy: Canada, Mexico and North American Security

Economic Integration and the Governance of Cross-Border Regions: Forms and Functions of Cross-Border Urban Regions - North American Functional Regions, European Territorial Regions


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.