|
|
|
|
Identities of Competitive States in U.S. Presidential Elections: Electoral College Bias or Candidate-Centered Politics? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Competition is essential to U.S. democracy. When there is
conflict, problems are defined, attention focused, alternatives judged,
and decisions made. This study examines the consistency with which the
same states have been competitive from one presidential election to the
next. Competitive states are states where candidates win by 5 percent
or less of the state's popular vote. Competitive and non-competitive states
were identified for presidential elections from 1844 to 2000. When
discussing the biases of the Electoral College, researchers mention
that competitive states seem to occur randomly without any further
study or explanation. A statistical analysis illustrates that the
identities of competitive states have become more unpredictable over
time. In terms of representation, the fact that competitive states are
not consistent means different states are in the presidential spotlight
at different times. As opposed to any biases associated with the
Electoral College, the changes in consistency seem to coincide with the
rise of candidate-centered politics and the decreasing strength of
parties. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
state (219), competit (93), elector (90), elect (75), colleg (74), vote (68), parti (49), presidenti (39), candid (35), larg (33), time (33), one (32), polit (28), small (28), 2000 (27), campaign (26), medium (22), differ (20), new (19), chang (19), system (19), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: The Midwest Political Science Association URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Johnson, Bonnie. "Identities of Competitive States in U.S. Presidential Elections: Electoral College Bias or Candidate-Centered Politics?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, Apr 15, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p82421_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Johnson, B. J. , 2004-04-15 "Identities of Competitive States in U.S. Presidential Elections: Electoral College Bias or Candidate-Centered Politics?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p82421_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Competition is essential to U.S. democracy. When there is
conflict, problems are defined, attention focused, alternatives judged,
and decisions made. This study examines the consistency with which the
same states have been competitive from one presidential election to the
next. Competitive states are states where candidates win by 5 percent
or less of the state's popular vote. Competitive and non-competitive states
were identified for presidential elections from 1844 to 2000. When
discussing the biases of the Electoral College, researchers mention
that competitive states seem to occur randomly without any further
study or explanation. A statistical analysis illustrates that the
identities of competitive states have become more unpredictable over
time. In terms of representation, the fact that competitive states are
not consistent means different states are in the presidential spotlight
at different times. As opposed to any biases associated with the
Electoral College, the changes in consistency seem to coincide with the
rise of candidate-centered politics and the decreasing strength of
parties. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
23 |
| Word count: |
5946 |
| Text sample: |
| Identities of Competitive States in U.S. Presidential Elections: Electoral College Bias or Candidate-Centered Politics? By Bonnie J. Johnson 1541 Lilac Lane Lawrence KS Department of Political Science University of Kansas bojojohn@ku.edu When discussing the biases of the Electoral College researchers conclude that competitive states seem to occur randomly without any further study or explanation. This study examines the consistency with which the same states have been competitive from one presidential election to the next. Competitive states are states where |
| 19 19 20 Presidential Election Years 23 |
Similar Titles:
Move to the Center or Mobilize the Base? Effects of Political Competition, Voter Turnout, and Partisan Loyalties on the Ideological Convergence of Vote-Maximizing Candidates in Two-Party Competition
The Veteran Vote: Electoral Effects of Candidate and Voter Military Service in Presidential Campaigns
|
|