Citation

Internet Effects on Voting:Political Internet Users VS Non-Political Internet Users

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Theory: Recent Internet related
literatures showed that the Internet reinforces likely voters but fail
to recruits unlikely voters. However most researches did not account
the purpose of Internet usage, especially its use for political
purpose. Despite of uncountable political information within the
Internet, non-political internet users tend not to access political
information. Thus, Internet effects on voting are actually appeared
only among political-Internet users. Since netizens use the Internet
self-selectively, the research about the Internet effects on voting
should consider the purpose of the Internet usage and the degree of
Internet usage. Hypothesis: Since Internet is an active rather than
passive information access tool, political internet users are more
willingly to access political information than general Internet users.
It naturally reinforces likely voters to vote and recruits unlikely
voters to vote. However, for those non-political users as well as
non-users, the Internet is not a powerful political means no matter how
much they use the Internet.
Data: Telephone survey was conducted in the spring of 2003 (from March
to June) by Social Behavior Research Institution at Purdue University.
Method: Series of questions asked to measure respondents’ usage of
Internet for political purpose. Discriminant analysis is used for
clarifying likely voters and unlikely voters. Crosstable will be
produced to compare estimated turnout and actual turnout to see whether
Internet performs reinforce role or recruitment role among political
Internet users, general Internet users and non-users. Anticipated
result: For political users, both reinforcement role among likely
voters and recruitment role among unlikely voters will be confirmed.
For general Internet users, only reinforce role will be confirmed among
likely voters. However, there is no difference significantly between
general Internet users and non-users both reinforcement and recruitment
role indicating in fact no Internet effects for general Internet users
and non-users. Implication: Most Internet users are
specific-information finder rather than mindless suffers. The effects
of the Internet in political attitude as well as other attitude do
significantly rely on the degree of Internet usage and the purpose of
using Internet. To measure Internet effects appropriately, knowing how
much do they use and what their purposes is the first thing to do. It
will help Internet-Information-providers to draw maximum
effect.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

polit (255), user (255), internet (163), 0.00 (88), inform (79), general (75), differ (67), non (62), voter (57), activ (56), divid (51), digit (51), use (45), vote (40), non-us (40), among (37), effect (34), peopl (34), 1996 (33), turnout (31), line (30),

Author's Keywords:

Internet, voting, digital divide, political user, recruit, reinforce
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: The Midwest Political Science Association
URL:
http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p82423_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Park, Hyung Lae. and Jang, Jae won. "Internet Effects on Voting:Political Internet Users VS Non-Political Internet Users" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, Apr 15, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p82423_index.html>

APA Citation:

Park, H. and Jang, J. , 2004-04-15 "Internet Effects on Voting:Political Internet Users VS Non-Political Internet Users" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p82423_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Theory: Recent Internet related
literatures showed that the Internet reinforces likely voters but fail
to recruits unlikely voters. However most researches did not account
the purpose of Internet usage, especially its use for political
purpose. Despite of uncountable political information within the
Internet, non-political internet users tend not to access political
information. Thus, Internet effects on voting are actually appeared
only among political-Internet users. Since netizens use the Internet
self-selectively, the research about the Internet effects on voting
should consider the purpose of the Internet usage and the degree of
Internet usage. Hypothesis: Since Internet is an active rather than
passive information access tool, political internet users are more
willingly to access political information than general Internet users.
It naturally reinforces likely voters to vote and recruits unlikely
voters to vote. However, for those non-political users as well as
non-users, the Internet is not a powerful political means no matter how
much they use the Internet.
Data: Telephone survey was conducted in the spring of 2003 (from March
to June) by Social Behavior Research Institution at Purdue University.
Method: Series of questions asked to measure respondents’ usage of
Internet for political purpose. Discriminant analysis is used for
clarifying likely voters and unlikely voters. Crosstable will be
produced to compare estimated turnout and actual turnout to see whether
Internet performs reinforce role or recruitment role among political
Internet users, general Internet users and non-users. Anticipated
result: For political users, both reinforcement role among likely
voters and recruitment role among unlikely voters will be confirmed.
For general Internet users, only reinforce role will be confirmed among
likely voters. However, there is no difference significantly between
general Internet users and non-users both reinforcement and recruitment
role indicating in fact no Internet effects for general Internet users
and non-users. Implication: Most Internet users are
specific-information finder rather than mindless suffers. The effects
of the Internet in political attitude as well as other attitude do
significantly rely on the degree of Internet usage and the purpose of
using Internet. To measure Internet effects appropriately, knowing how
much do they use and what their purposes is the first thing to do. It
will help Internet-Information-providers to draw maximum
effect.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available The Midwest Political Science Association
Associated Document Available Political Research Online

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 32
Word count: 6939
Text sample:
Internet Effects on Voting: Political Internet Users VS Non Political Internet Hyung Lae Park Graduate Student Department of Political Science Purdue University 2299 BRNG West Lafayette Indiana 47907-1363 park@polsci.purdue.edu Jae Won Jang Graduate Student Department of Political Science Purdue University 2299 BRNG West Lafayette Indiana 47907-1363 jang@polsci.purdue.edu Prepared for delivery at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago IL April 15-April 18 2004 (This is a draft; please do not cite without permission from the
Tom and Suzanne Brunsting. 2002. “Collective Action in the Age of the Internet.” Social Science Computer Review 20:290-301. Shaw Daron R. 1999. “The effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes 1988-96.” American Political Science Review 93:345-361. Street John. 1997. “Remote Democracy? Politics Technology and Electronic Democracy” European Journal of Communication 12:27-42. Tolbert Carolin and Ramona McNeal. 2001. Does the Internet Increase Voter Participation in Elections? paper presented American political Science Association Annual meeting at San


Similar Titles:
Young people and voting: the effect of household and local context on the turnout of young people at a recent British general election

Public Attitudes About Political Participation on the Internet: Do People Perceive Political Activities Performed Online and Offline to be Equally Effective?

Differences in Citizenship, Registration, and Voter Turnout: Diversity among Six Major Asian Immigrant Groups


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.