All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"Buying" Votes in Japan's Lower House
Unformatted Document Text:  17 addition, rival fund expenditures has a statistically significant negative impact upon LDP vote shares, or a loss of 3% of the vote share for each additional ¥100 ($.94) spent by the main rival (0.03 for ¥1). 16 These models suggest the importance of “own spending” effects for the LDP upon vote shares. All of the “own spending” variables—both the campaign period and year- based ones—are statistically significant and positively correlated with LDP vote shares. These results support Hypothesis 1, which postulates that own spending should positively increase vote share. However, Hypothesis 2, which states that the effects of rival expenditures should be negatively correlated, is not supported for local party branch or koenkai expenditures, but only through the results of fund agent spending reported in Models II and III. As rival fund agent spending appears to have a small effect on LDP vote shares, I examine whether there are any significant simultaneity effects between own and rival expenditures and vote shares. Using path analysis and standard OLS regression, I did not uncover any statistically significant indirect effects between rival expenditures, own expenditures and vote shares for the LDP. 17 How much LDP candidates spend during the year-based period does not appear to be related to the expenditures of their main rival. However, the year-based expenditures of their main rivals do have a small statistically significant effect on their district share of the vote as demonstrated in the above models. 16 The coefficient for rival campaign-period expenditures also show a statistically significant positive effect on LDP vote shares, although there is no theoretical expectation for this result. 17 I examined the effects of total rival spending on the total expenditures of LDP and found no statistically significant results for either party (results available from author). In a standard OLS regression of rival spending on own spending, the coefficient was insignificant at 0.00(.10) for the LDP and 0.04(0.03) for the DPJ, mirroring similar inconclusive results using path analysis.

Authors: Carlson, Matthew.
first   previous   Page 18 of 25   next   last



background image
17
addition, rival fund expenditures has a statistically significant negative impact upon LDP
vote shares, or a loss of 3% of the vote share for each additional ¥100 ($.94) spent by the
main rival (0.03 for ¥1).
16
These models suggest the importance of “own spending” effects for the LDP upon
vote shares. All of the “own spending” variables—both the campaign period and year-
based ones—are statistically significant and positively correlated with LDP vote shares.
These results support Hypothesis 1, which postulates that own spending should positively
increase vote share. However, Hypothesis 2, which states that the effects of rival
expenditures should be negatively correlated, is not supported for local party branch or
koenkai expenditures, but only through the results of fund agent spending reported in
Models II and III.
As rival fund agent spending appears to have a small effect on LDP vote shares, I
examine whether there are any significant simultaneity effects between own and rival
expenditures and vote shares. Using path analysis and standard OLS regression, I did not
uncover any statistically significant indirect effects between rival expenditures, own
expenditures and vote shares for the LDP.
17
How much LDP candidates spend during the
year-based period does not appear to be related to the expenditures of their main rival.
However, the year-based expenditures of their main rivals do have a small statistically
significant effect on their district share of the vote as demonstrated in the above models.
16
The coefficient for rival campaign-period expenditures also show a statistically significant positive effect
on LDP vote shares, although there is no theoretical expectation for this result.
17
I examined the effects of total rival spending on the total expenditures of LDP and found no statistically
significant results for either party (results available from author). In a standard OLS regression of rival
spending on own spending, the coefficient was insignificant at 0.00(.10) for the LDP and 0.04(0.03) for the
DPJ, mirroring similar inconclusive results using path analysis.


Convention
All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 18 of 25   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.