All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

You've Got Politics! E-mail and Political Communication in Silicon Valley
Unformatted Document Text:  24 Larsen, Elena and Lee Rainie. 2002. Digital Town Hall: How Local Officials Use the Internet and the Civic Benefits They Cite from Dealing with Constituents Online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Lee, Jennifer 8. 2003. “We Hate Spam, Congress Says (Except Ours).” The New York Times, December 28, 2003. Lemke, Tim. 2004. “Spam creates political-race headaches.” The Washington Times, January 30, 2004. Marschall, Melissa J. and Wayne T. Curtin. 2000. “Communications Technology and the U.S. House of Representatives.” Unpublished report submitted to IBM Center for the Business of Government. Meckler, Laura. 1999. “Campaign Warfare Rages on Candidates’ Web Sites.” The Arizona Republic, November 26, 1999. Meyerson, Harold. 2003. “Democrats' Online Appeal.” The Washington Post, June 18, 2003. Miller, Stanley A., II. 2004. “Political spamming can backfire on candidates, experts say.” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, January 27, 2004. Morello, Carol and Spencer S. Hsu. 2004. “Ricin Partially Shuts Senate; 3 Buildings Sealed; Toxin Was Mailed to White House in Nov.,” The Washington Post, February 4, 2004. Morris, Dick. 1999. Vote.com. Los Angeles: Renaissance Books. Neu, C. Richard, Robert H. Anderson, and Tora K. Bickson. 1999. Sending Your Government a Message: E-mail Communication Between Citizen and Government. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. Preston, Morag. 1999. “Appealing to the e-generation.” The Times (London), September 29, 1999. Purpuro Larry. 2002. “The Big Push: The Case for Political E-Mailing.” Campaigns & Elections, October/November 2002. Rash, Wayne, Jr. 1997. Politics on the Nets: Wiring the Political Process. New York: W.H. Freeman. Reston, Maeve. 2003. “A Wired Dean Is Altering Conduct of Politics.” Pittsburgh Post- Gazette, November 16, 2003. Rother, Caitlin. 2003. “Council was sent e-mails on strip club laws.” The San Diego Union- Tribune, September 27, 2003.

Authors: Chen, Elsa.
first   previous   Page 25 of 26   next   last



background image
24
Larsen, Elena and Lee Rainie. 2002. Digital Town Hall: How Local Officials Use the Internet
and the Civic Benefits They Cite from Dealing with Constituents Online. Washington,
DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

Lee, Jennifer 8. 2003. “We Hate Spam, Congress Says (Except Ours).” The New York Times,
December 28, 2003.

Lemke, Tim. 2004. “Spam creates political-race headaches.” The Washington Times, January
30, 2004.

Marschall, Melissa J. and Wayne T. Curtin. 2000. “Communications Technology and the U.S.
House of Representatives.” Unpublished report submitted to IBM Center for the
Business of Government.
Meckler, Laura. 1999. “Campaign Warfare Rages on Candidates’ Web Sites.” The Arizona
Republic, November 26, 1999.

Meyerson, Harold. 2003. “Democrats' Online Appeal.” The Washington Post, June 18, 2003.

Miller, Stanley A., II. 2004. “Political spamming can backfire on candidates, experts say.”
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, January 27, 2004.

Morello, Carol and Spencer S. Hsu. 2004. “Ricin Partially Shuts Senate; 3 Buildings Sealed;
Toxin Was Mailed to White House in Nov.,” The Washington Post, February 4, 2004.

Morris, Dick. 1999. Vote.com. Los Angeles: Renaissance Books.

Neu, C. Richard, Robert H. Anderson, and Tora K. Bickson. 1999. Sending Your Government a
Message: E-mail Communication Between Citizen and Government. Santa Monica, CA:
RAND.

Preston, Morag. 1999. “Appealing to the e-generation.” The Times (London), September 29,
1999.

Purpuro Larry. 2002. “The Big Push: The Case for Political E-Mailing.” Campaigns &
Elections, October/November 2002.

Rash, Wayne, Jr. 1997. Politics on the Nets: Wiring the Political Process. New York: W.H.
Freeman.

Reston, Maeve. 2003. “A Wired Dean Is Altering Conduct of Politics.” Pittsburgh Post-
Gazette, November 16, 2003.

Rother, Caitlin. 2003. “Council was sent e-mails on strip club laws.” The San Diego Union-
Tribune, September 27, 2003.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 25 of 26   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.