|
|
|
|
Representation and Local Policy:Relating Ideology to County-Level Policy Adoption |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Scholars of comparative state politics have successfully used national survey data to create aggregate measures of state-level ideology. Consequently, they have shown that state-level political ideology has a profound affect on policy outputs and outcomes across a wide range of public policy issues. In this paper, we suggest the political orientations of even more localized mass publics affect sub-national public policy outputs. Specifically, we argue that state politics research would be advanced by taking better account of the significant ideological variation found within individual states. These ideological dispositions are likely to affect policy implemented at the local level. Using methodology similar to that used by Erikson, Wright, and McIver (1993) at the state level, we develop measures of county-level ideology by disaggregating statewide California Field Poll surveys, 1990-1999. We examine the relationship between this more localized measure of political ideology and a number of policies at the local level, including criminal justice, health care, educational services, welfare, and transportation. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
polici (135), counti (135), ideolog (98), polit (87), local (73), state (71), level (58), measur (58), public (57), drug (40), use (35), like (35), govern (32), california (29), welfar (27), sampl (27), servic (26), poll (25), influenc (25), field (25), variabl (24), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: The Midwest Political Science Association URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Percival, Garrick., Johnson, Martin. and Neiman, Max. "Representation and Local Policy:Relating Ideology to County-Level Policy Adoption" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, Apr 15, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p83541_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Percival, G. L., Johnson, M. and Neiman, M. , 2004-04-15 "Representation and Local Policy:Relating Ideology to County-Level Policy Adoption" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p83541_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Scholars of comparative state politics have successfully used national survey data to create aggregate measures of state-level ideology. Consequently, they have shown that state-level political ideology has a profound affect on policy outputs and outcomes across a wide range of public policy issues. In this paper, we suggest the political orientations of even more localized mass publics affect sub-national public policy outputs. Specifically, we argue that state politics research would be advanced by taking better account of the significant ideological variation found within individual states. These ideological dispositions are likely to affect policy implemented at the local level. Using methodology similar to that used by Erikson, Wright, and McIver (1993) at the state level, we develop measures of county-level ideology by disaggregating statewide California Field Poll surveys, 1990-1999. We examine the relationship between this more localized measure of political ideology and a number of policies at the local level, including criminal justice, health care, educational services, welfare, and transportation. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
29 |
| Word count: |
7297 |
| Text sample: |
| Representation and Local Policy: Relating County-Level Public Opinion to Policy Outputs Garrick Percival Department of Political Science University of California Riverside percival@citrus.ucr.edu Martin Johnson Department of Political Science University of California Riverside martin.johnson@ucr.edu Max Neiman Department of Political Science University of California Riverside max.neiman@ucr.edu Abstract Scholars of comparative state politics have successfully used national survey data to create aggregate measures of state-level ideology. Consequently they have shown that state-level political ideology has a profound affect on policy outputs and |
| (96.58) Constant .313 -.001 14.99 -.169 22.36 45.76 68.45 618.70 (.874) (.001) (13.44) (8.67) (37.10) (61.02) (69.51) (93.02) N 46 47 46 43 48 46 46 47 R2 .40 .38 .21 .26 .26 .16 .26 .60 F(d.f.) 5.62 ** 5.10** 2.818 3.43** 2.69** 1.61 3.61** 16.70 (42) (43) (42) (39) (43) (42) (42) Reported above are OLS b coefficients with standard errors in parentheses. ***p<.001 **p<.01 *p<.05 +p<.10 28 |
Similar Titles:
Local Media, Public Opinion, and State Legislative Policies: Agenda Setting at the State Level
Local Media, Public Opinion, and State Government Policy: Second-Level Agenda Setting and Political Bias
Public Support for E-Government at the Local Level: Evaluating Self-Interest and Symbolic Politics Explanations
|
|