|
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: The Midwest Political Science Association URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Kselman, Daniel. and Niou, Emerson. "Why Voters Desert Their Favorite Candidate: Voting Behavior in 3-Candidate Plurality Elections" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois, Apr 07, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p85141_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Kselman, D. M. and Niou, E. , 2005-04-07 "Why Voters Desert Their Favorite Candidate: Voting Behavior in 3-Candidate Plurality Elections" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, Illinois <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p85141_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In this paper we analyze and begin to empirically test an amendment to the calculus of voting, an expected utility model of voter behavior. Both STRATEGIC and PROTEST voters may rationally choose a candidate other than their most-preferred. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
Similar Titles:
Presidential Debates, Candidate Preferences, and Voting Behavior: Linking Debate Content to Voters' Assessments
Korean voters’ issue voting behavior in the 16th Korean presidential election
|
|