|
|
|
|
Limiting Dissent: the Mechanisms of Suppression in the United States |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Despite the longstanding traditions of tolerance, inclusion, and democracy in the United States, dissident citizens and social movements have historically experienced significant and sustained—although often subtle and difficult-to-observe—suppression in this country. Using mechanism-based social-movement theory, this paper explores a number of episodes of contention in twentieth-century USAmerica, involving such groups as the early-century anarchists, the Black Panther Party, and the modern-day globalization movement. First I delineate a typology of actions that the state and mass media engage in to suppress dissent. Then I shift analytically from these twelve Modes of Suppression to the five dynamic, interactive Mechanisms of Suppression that animate demobilization: Resource Depletion, Stigmatization, Divisive Disruption, Intimidation, and Emulation. Drawing from mass-media accounts, FBI documents, secondary histories, and other data sources, I explain how the state and mass media have engaged in activity that—operating through social mechanisms—inhibits the preconditions for collective action, either through raising the costs or minimizing the benefits of mobilization. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
social (198), mechan (167), movement (154), suppress (150), state (109), 2004 (93), group (88), dissent (79), polit (78), dissid (78), media (67), mode (65), mass (61), resourc (60), unit (60), scienc (58), also (54), meet (53), univers (52), american (52), associ (51), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Western Political Science Association URL: http://www.csus.edu/ORG/WPSA/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Boykoff, Jules. "Limiting Dissent: the Mechanisms of Suppression in the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Marriott Hotel, Portland, Oregon, Mar 11, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p87861_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Boykoff, J. M. , 2004-03-11 "Limiting Dissent: the Mechanisms of Suppression in the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Marriott Hotel, Portland, Oregon Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p87861_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Despite the longstanding traditions of tolerance, inclusion, and democracy in the United States, dissident citizens and social movements have historically experienced significant and sustained—although often subtle and difficult-to-observe—suppression in this country. Using mechanism-based social-movement theory, this paper explores a number of episodes of contention in twentieth-century USAmerica, involving such groups as the early-century anarchists, the Black Panther Party, and the modern-day globalization movement. First I delineate a typology of actions that the state and mass media engage in to suppress dissent. Then I shift analytically from these twelve Modes of Suppression to the five dynamic, interactive Mechanisms of Suppression that animate demobilization: Resource Depletion, Stigmatization, Divisive Disruption, Intimidation, and Emulation. Drawing from mass-media accounts, FBI documents, secondary histories, and other data sources, I explain how the state and mass media have engaged in activity that—operating through social mechanisms—inhibits the preconditions for collective action, either through raising the costs or minimizing the benefits of mobilization. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
71 |
| Word count: |
24651 |
| Text sample: |
| Jules Boykoff (American University) Limiting Dissent: the Mechanisms of Suppression in the United States For the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association Portland Oregon March 2004. Despite the longstanding traditions of tolerance inclusion and democracy in the United States dissident citizens and social movements have historically experienced significant and sustained—although often subtle and difficult-to-observe—suppression in this country. Using mechanism-based social-movement theory this paper explores a number of episodes of contention in twentieth-century USAmerica involving such groups |
| Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings New York: Cambridge University Press 1996. pp 227-258. Wells Janet. “$1 Million Bail Ordered for Protesters: Berkeley-Based Activist Allegedly Led Mayhem.” San Francisco Chronicle 5 August 2000 A3. Zald Mayer. “Looking Back to Look Forward: Reflections on the Past and Future of the Resource Mobilization Research Program.” In Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller (eds.). Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press 1992. pp. |
Similar Titles:
Places of Socialization and (Sub)ethnic Identities among Asian Immigrants in the United States: Evidence from the Chinese American Homeland Politics Survey, 2007
The New Polarization in American Politics: Interest Groups, Mass Media and Contestation of the Abortion Issue
Race and the State: The Importance of Original Incorporation in the Development of the United States for the Current Political-Social-Economic Status of National-Origin Groups
|
|