|
|
|
|
Increasing tolerance or increasingly selective intolerance? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
According to GSS, Americans showed a slightly decreasing tendency to deny the
political rights of five target groups during 1976-1998. Although practically we cannot
distinguish between a society in which people exercise tolerance because they are maximally
committed to civil liberties (are absolute tolerant), and a society in which no one hates
anybody to the extent of limiting their rights, for theory and predictions it makes sense to test
whether tolerance is a multivalent personality trait, or is situational and group-related (possibly
bringing about pluralistic intolerance). In a half-confirmatory and half-exploratory research, I
replicated Mondak and Sanderss (2003) finding with the joint 1998 and 2000 GSS data. The
proportion of absolute tolerants is 21.23%, but the interpretation of this fact remains open to
discussion. First, there is a social desirability effect at work, and second, the pluralistic
intolerance hypothesis has also received support. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
intoler (113), toler (110), group (103), 0.000 (101), toward (72), 1 (57), variabl (53), target (49), q (37), 0 (36), social (36), case (33), peopl (33), r2 (33), answer (31), 3 (31), real (30), incom (30), homosexu (29), one (28), urban (27), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Southwestern Political Science Association URL: http://www.swpsa.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Koos, Agnes. "Increasing tolerance or increasingly selective intolerance?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, Fairmont Hotel, Mar 23, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89008_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Koos, A. , 2005-03-23 "Increasing tolerance or increasingly selective intolerance?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, Fairmont Hotel Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p89008_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: According to GSS, Americans showed a slightly decreasing tendency to deny the
political rights of five target groups during 1976-1998. Although practically we cannot
distinguish between a society in which people exercise tolerance because they are maximally
committed to civil liberties (are absolute tolerant), and a society in which no one hates
anybody to the extent of limiting their rights, for theory and predictions it makes sense to test
whether tolerance is a multivalent personality trait, or is situational and group-related (possibly
bringing about pluralistic intolerance). In a half-confirmatory and half-exploratory research, I
replicated Mondak and Sanderss (2003) finding with the joint 1998 and 2000 GSS data. The
proportion of absolute tolerants is 21.23%, but the interpretation of this fact remains open to
discussion. First, there is a social desirability effect at work, and second, the pluralistic
intolerance hypothesis has also received support. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.pdf |
| Page count: |
30 |
| Word count: |
7773 |
| Text sample: |
| Abstract INCREASING TOLERANCE OR INCREASINGLY SELECTIVE INTOLERANCE? According to GSS Americans showed a slightly decreasing tendency to deny the political rights of five target groups during 1976-1998. Although practically we cannot distinguish between a society in which people exercise tolerance because they are maximally committed to civil liberties (are "absolute tolerant") and a society in which no one hates anybody to the extent of limiting their rights for theory and predictions it makes sense to test whether tolerance is |
| Legalizing marijuana Q 95 1: Marijuana should be made legal 2: Should not PornoLaw Outlawing pornography Q 222 1: Laws against distribution needed 2: Laws against distribution age < 18 3: No restriction on pornography PolicemanHit When a policeman can Q 232 a b c d 0: Never Maximum value 1. hit a citizen recoded (average of five answers) 30 |
Similar Titles:
Economic Inequality and Social Attitudes: Assessing Attitudes toward Homosexuality in 38 Democracies
Tolerance Judgments in Multicultural Democracies: Target Groups and the Role of Social Diversity
Exposure to Media and Unemployed People's Attitudes toward Market Justice in Urban China
|
|