|
|
|
|
Structural Change in Communication Between 1991 and 2005: A Social and Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
This paper examines the structure of the International Communication Association (ICA) through a network analysis based on joint memberships in the ICA’s divisions and interests groups and through a semantic network analysis based on the shared use of symbols in conference paper titles. The structure of ICA in 2005 based on the joint memberships was compared to the structure in 1991. The results suggest the dimensions that differentiate the divisions/interests groups, have remained constant. As reported by Barnett and Danowski (1992), ICA is organized along three dimensions: mass to interpersonal, humanities to social sciences and applied to theoretical. that there was a change in the divisions’ centrality between 1991 and 2005. Also, while Mass communication remained at the center of the network, the Technology and Political Communication divisions became more central. The semantic network analysis found that Philosophy and International/Intercultural Communication were the most central with Interpersonal and Information Systems at the periphery with the recently formed interest groups. Finally, there is a significant correlation between the semantic network and the network of joint memberships. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
communic (163), network (127), divis (97), analysi (66), 1 (53), 2005 (51), group (44), central (43), ica (42), semant (41), structur (39), interest (33), mass (32), 1991 (31), base (31), interperson (30), disciplin (30), membership (30), barnett (28), research (26), two (26), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Lee, Sungjoon. and Barnett, George. "Structural Change in Communication Between 1991 and 2005: A Social and Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany, Jun 16, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p90433_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Lee, S. and Barnett, G. A. , 2006-06-16 "Structural Change in Communication Between 1991 and 2005: A Social and Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany Online <PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p90433_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper examines the structure of the International Communication Association (ICA) through a network analysis based on joint memberships in the ICA’s divisions and interests groups and through a semantic network analysis based on the shared use of symbols in conference paper titles. The structure of ICA in 2005 based on the joint memberships was compared to the structure in 1991. The results suggest the dimensions that differentiate the divisions/interests groups, have remained constant. As reported by Barnett and Danowski (1992), ICA is organized along three dimensions: mass to interpersonal, humanities to social sciences and applied to theoretical. that there was a change in the divisions’ centrality between 1991 and 2005. Also, while Mass communication remained at the center of the network, the Technology and Political Communication divisions became more central. The semantic network analysis found that Philosophy and International/Intercultural Communication were the most central with Interpersonal and Information Systems at the periphery with the recently formed interest groups. Finally, there is a significant correlation between the semantic network and the network of joint memberships. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
22 |
| Word count: |
7193 |
| Text sample: |
| Network Analysis of the ICA --1 Running head: STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN COMMUNICATION Structural Change in Communication between 1991 and 2005: A Social and Semantic Network Analysis of the International Communication Association Sungjoon Lee sl76@buffalo.edu and George A. Barnett Department of Communication School of Informatics State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo NY 14260-1060 gbarnett@buffalo.edu October 2005 Paper submitted for possible presentation to the International Communication Association’s annual conference Dresden Germany June 2006. 1 Network Analysis of the ICA |
| group is proportional to its number of members. 43 joint memberships are required for a line between two divisions/ interest groups. The thickness of the line between the nodes is proportional to the strength of their relationship. 20 Network Analysis of the ICA --21 Figure 2 ICA Semantic Network for 2005 The radius of a division/interest group is proportional to its number of members. A line between two nodes is present if the strength of the neural network connection |
Similar Titles:
The Structure of an Online Discussion - Using Network Analysis to Study a Political Usenet Group
Interest Groups, Polarization, and Abortion Debate Structure: Social Network Analysis of “Frames"
A Topical Meta-Analysis of the Internet and New Media Research from 1991 to 2005: Using Semantic Network and Categorical Content Analyses
Mapping the Structure of Communication: A Social and Semantic Network Analysis of the National Communication Association (NCA)
|
|