Citation

Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Strategic and Nonstrategic Behaviors of Deceivers and Truth Tellers, Communication Skills, and Dynamic Character of Deception

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

One of the interaction phenomena that have been of great interest to scholars is deception. The present study tests some propositions and ideas of the interpersonal deception theory, namely, whether engaging in strategic behavior and displaying more nonstrategic cues are more characteristic of deceivers than truth tellers; if skilled senders perform more strategic activities; and the dynamic character of deception in interactive contexts. The results reveal that there is no significant difference between deceivers and truth tellers in behavior management, strategy use and nonstrategic behavior. There is not enough evidence that deceivers, as well as truth tellers, apply strategies or modify their behavior necessarily based on partners’ reactions. Finally, the results do not support the idea that more skilled senders are better at appearing truthful by performing more strategic behavior, although the findings indicate that they exercise more behavior control.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

behavior (97), truth (71), 1 (55), decept (54), deceiv (54), teller (45), particip (45), strategi (40), communic (36), test (34), use (33), interrog (33), strateg (31), lie (30), control (30), social (29), m (27), depaulo (27), differ (26), 1996 (26), one (24),

Author's Keywords:

Deception, strategic behavior, nonstrategic behavior, behavior control, communication skills, interpersonal deception theory
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Communication Association
URL:
http://www.icahdq.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p92532_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Vasilyeva, Alena. and Frank, Mark. "Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Strategic and Nonstrategic Behaviors of Deceivers and Truth Tellers, Communication Skills, and Dynamic Character of Deception" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany, <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p92532_index.html>

APA Citation:

Vasilyeva, A. and Frank, M. G. "Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Strategic and Nonstrategic Behaviors of Deceivers and Truth Tellers, Communication Skills, and Dynamic Character of Deception" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany Online <PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p92532_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: One of the interaction phenomena that have been of great interest to scholars is deception. The present study tests some propositions and ideas of the interpersonal deception theory, namely, whether engaging in strategic behavior and displaying more nonstrategic cues are more characteristic of deceivers than truth tellers; if skilled senders perform more strategic activities; and the dynamic character of deception in interactive contexts. The results reveal that there is no significant difference between deceivers and truth tellers in behavior management, strategy use and nonstrategic behavior. There is not enough evidence that deceivers, as well as truth tellers, apply strategies or modify their behavior necessarily based on partners’ reactions. Finally, the results do not support the idea that more skilled senders are better at appearing truthful by performing more strategic behavior, although the findings indicate that they exercise more behavior control.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 21
Word count: 5212
Text sample:
Testing IDT 1 Abstract One of the interaction phenomena that have been of great interest to scholars is deception. The present study tests some propositions and ideas of the interpersonal deception theory namely whether engaging in strategic behavior and displaying more nonstrategic cues are more characteristic of deceivers than truth tellers; if skilled senders perform more strategic activities; and the dynamic character of deception in interactive contexts. The results reveal that there is no significant difference between deceivers and
the check physically as if 1 1 a person did not care To be hazy (neither directly to tell the truth 1 1 nor to lie) To use distractive techniques to change the subject 2 2 To interject humor 1 1 To get the interrogator to laugh 1 1 To say what one believes 1 1 To be interested 1 1 To stress one’s background 1 1 (e.g. being a Catholic) Total 37 34 71 _____________________________________________________________________________ Testing IDT 21


Similar Titles:
Participation in Alcohol-Involved Social Gatherings: A Test of Theory of Planned Behavior in Korea

Gift Exchange and Status Differences: An Experimental Test of Behavior-Status and Social Exchange Theories

Gifts and Social Status: On-Going Experimental Tests of Behavior-Status and Social Exchange Theories

Drunk-Driving and the Prediction of Analogous Behavior: A Longitudinal Test of Social Learning and Self-Control Theories


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.