|
|
|
|
Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Strategic and Nonstrategic Behaviors of Deceivers and Truth Tellers, Communication Skills, and Dynamic Character of Deception |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
One of the interaction phenomena that have been of great interest to scholars is deception. The present study tests some propositions and ideas of the interpersonal deception theory, namely, whether engaging in strategic behavior and displaying more nonstrategic cues are more characteristic of deceivers than truth tellers; if skilled senders perform more strategic activities; and the dynamic character of deception in interactive contexts. The results reveal that there is no significant difference between deceivers and truth tellers in behavior management, strategy use and nonstrategic behavior. There is not enough evidence that deceivers, as well as truth tellers, apply strategies or modify their behavior necessarily based on partners’ reactions. Finally, the results do not support the idea that more skilled senders are better at appearing truthful by performing more strategic behavior, although the findings indicate that they exercise more behavior control. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
behavior (97), truth (71), 1 (55), decept (54), deceiv (54), teller (45), particip (45), strategi (40), communic (36), test (34), use (33), interrog (33), strateg (31), lie (30), control (30), social (29), m (27), depaulo (27), differ (26), 1996 (26), one (24), |
Author's Keywords:
|
Deception, strategic behavior, nonstrategic behavior, behavior control, communication skills, interpersonal deception theory |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Communication Association URL: http://www.icahdq.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Vasilyeva, Alena. and Frank, Mark. "Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Strategic and Nonstrategic Behaviors of Deceivers and Truth Tellers, Communication Skills, and Dynamic Character of Deception" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany, <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p92532_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Vasilyeva, A. and Frank, M. G. "Testing Interpersonal Deception Theory: Strategic and Nonstrategic Behaviors of Deceivers and Truth Tellers, Communication Skills, and Dynamic Character of Deception" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden International Congress Centre, Dresden, Germany Online <PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p92532_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: One of the interaction phenomena that have been of great interest to scholars is deception. The present study tests some propositions and ideas of the interpersonal deception theory, namely, whether engaging in strategic behavior and displaying more nonstrategic cues are more characteristic of deceivers than truth tellers; if skilled senders perform more strategic activities; and the dynamic character of deception in interactive contexts. The results reveal that there is no significant difference between deceivers and truth tellers in behavior management, strategy use and nonstrategic behavior. There is not enough evidence that deceivers, as well as truth tellers, apply strategies or modify their behavior necessarily based on partners’ reactions. Finally, the results do not support the idea that more skilled senders are better at appearing truthful by performing more strategic behavior, although the findings indicate that they exercise more behavior control. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
21 |
| Word count: |
5212 |
| Text sample: |
| Testing IDT 1 Abstract One of the interaction phenomena that have been of great interest to scholars is deception. The present study tests some propositions and ideas of the interpersonal deception theory namely whether engaging in strategic behavior and displaying more nonstrategic cues are more characteristic of deceivers than truth tellers; if skilled senders perform more strategic activities; and the dynamic character of deception in interactive contexts. The results reveal that there is no significant difference between deceivers and |
| the check physically as if 1 1 a person did not care To be hazy (neither directly to tell the truth 1 1 nor to lie) To use distractive techniques to change the subject 2 2 To interject humor 1 1 To get the interrogator to laugh 1 1 To say what one believes 1 1 To be interested 1 1 To stress one’s background 1 1 (e.g. being a Catholic) Total 37 34 71 _____________________________________________________________________________ Testing IDT 21 |
Similar Titles:
Participation in Alcohol-Involved Social Gatherings: A Test of Theory of Planned Behavior in Korea
Gift Exchange and Status Differences: An Experimental Test of Behavior-Status and Social Exchange Theories
Gifts and Social Status: On-Going Experimental Tests of Behavior-Status and Social Exchange Theories
Drunk-Driving and the Prediction of Analogous Behavior: A Longitudinal Test of Social Learning and Self-Control Theories
|
|