|
|
|
|
Anthropocentrism and Environmental Sociology: Re-evaluating the HEP-NEP Dichotomy |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
One of the theoretical landmarks of environmental sociology is Dunlap and Catton’s distinction between the “Human Exceptionalist Paradigm” and the “New Environmental Paradigm.” The HEP describes cultural values that emphasize the separation of society from nature. This perspective has dominated classical and contemporary sociology, leading sociologists to study human social action as though environmental factors were irrelevant. Instead, the NEP emphasizes that social action occurs within ecosystem processes and limits. The implication is that environmental variables become significant for sociological analysis. Dunlap and Catton claim that environmental sociology is defined by its willingness to embrace the NEP. Furthermore, the attempt to incorporate nature as a significant presence has been taken up by many sociologists. However, the claim that the HEP has limited consideration of the environment within the sociological tradition is problematic. Furthermore, their assertion that environmental sociologists should adopt an NEP standpoint has not materialized. “Exceptionalist” environmental sociologies abound within the subdiscipline. In this context, the HEP-NEP distinction may be read as a discursive device that works to “police the boundaries” of the subdiscipline. It may limit our appreciation of the richness of work that adopts a more “social” conception of the environment. Through an examination of the “Exceptionalist” work of the classical tradition and environmental constructionism, I will argue that a broader conception of “environmental sociology” is more useful, especially as a model for how nature may achieve a greater presence within the sociological “mainstream.” |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
environment (100), sociolog (92), natur (70), social (51), human (42), environ (33), nep (31), within (27), classic (26), tradit (23), work (20), dunlap (20), hep (20), anthropocentr (19), societi (19), polit (18), catton (18), ecolog (17), perspect (17), stoddart (16), may (16), |
|
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Stoddart, Mark. "Anthropocentrism and Environmental Sociology: Re-evaluating the HEP-NEP Dichotomy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug 10, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p93848_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Stoddart, M. C. , 2006-08-10 "Anthropocentrism and Environmental Sociology: Re-evaluating the HEP-NEP Dichotomy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p93848_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: One of the theoretical landmarks of environmental sociology is Dunlap and Catton’s distinction between the “Human Exceptionalist Paradigm” and the “New Environmental Paradigm.” The HEP describes cultural values that emphasize the separation of society from nature. This perspective has dominated classical and contemporary sociology, leading sociologists to study human social action as though environmental factors were irrelevant. Instead, the NEP emphasizes that social action occurs within ecosystem processes and limits. The implication is that environmental variables become significant for sociological analysis. Dunlap and Catton claim that environmental sociology is defined by its willingness to embrace the NEP. Furthermore, the attempt to incorporate nature as a significant presence has been taken up by many sociologists. However, the claim that the HEP has limited consideration of the environment within the sociological tradition is problematic. Furthermore, their assertion that environmental sociologists should adopt an NEP standpoint has not materialized. “Exceptionalist” environmental sociologies abound within the subdiscipline. In this context, the HEP-NEP distinction may be read as a discursive device that works to “police the boundaries” of the subdiscipline. It may limit our appreciation of the richness of work that adopts a more “social” conception of the environment. Through an examination of the “Exceptionalist” work of the classical tradition and environmental constructionism, I will argue that a broader conception of “environmental sociology” is more useful, especially as a model for how nature may achieve a greater presence within the sociological “mainstream.” |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
16 |
| Word count: |
4329 |
| Text sample: |
| Anthropocentrism and Environmental Sociology: Re-evaluating the HEP-NEP Dichotomy Mark C.J. Stoddart Department of Sociology & Anthropology University of British Columbia 6303 NW Marine Dr. Vancouver BC V6T 1Z1 phone: 604-707-0667 e-mail: mcjs@interchange.ubc.ca Stoddart 1 Abstract One of the theoretical landmarks of environmental sociology is Dunlap and Catton’s distinction between the “Human Exceptionalist Paradigm” and the “New Environmental Paradigm.” The HEP describes cultural values that emphasize the separation of society from nature. This perspective has dominated classical and contemporary sociology |
| Identity Knowledge and Emotion in Old-Growth Forests. Vancouver UBC Press. Schnaiberg Allan and Kenneth Alan Gould. 2000. Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict: The Blackburn Press. Simon Alexander. 1998. "Backlash! Corporate Front Groups and the Struggle for Sustainable Forestry in British Columbia." Capitalism Nature Socialism 9:3-36. Torgerson Douglas. 1999. "Images of Place in Green Politics: The Cultural Mirror of Indigenous Traditions." Pp. 186-203 in Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse edited by F. Fischer and M. A. |
Similar Titles:
The Right to Work as Part of Universal Human Rights- Is the Right to Work/the Decent Work Agenda Universal From the Perspective of Human Rights Politics?
Social Call for Public Policy Initiatives, To Ameliorate A Declining American Traditional Democratic Value...Human Repsectability of Generation Y (Millennials) and Generation Z (Internet): A Macro Perspective of Leake County, MS Public School System
An Integrative Theory: The Human Ecology and the Political Economy Perspectives in Study of Urban Sprawl
|
|