|
|
|
|
Race in the Ontology of North-South Relations |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The discipline of IR as it developed during the twentieth century was for the most part overwhelmingly eurocentric. The eurocentric character of IR, which is finally being given increasing attention by critical scholars, included a relative marginalisation of the question of North-South relations. Rather than recognising the centrality of relations of imperialism and colonialism to the structures, regulation and discourses of international relations over five centuries, North-South relations were considered at best a particular ?issue-area? of concern mainly to the subfield of IPE. This marginalisation of north-south relations has extended further to a blindness regarding the question of race in international relations. This paper considers the centrality of race in the historical development and reproduction of international relations. In order to do so it is necessary to re-think underlying assumptions regarding units of analysis and our basic model of social reality, including questions of cause and its extension in time and space. In other words, we need to reconsider the assumed ontology underlying and informing the study of international relations. It is in part the empiricist ontology underlying the mainstream of IR which has led to the lack of recognition of race in contemporary international relations. The paper outlines a more adequate theory of ontology, informed by critical realism, which can form the basis for a critical analysis of the international relations of race and the racialised form of international relations. The contemporary structure of North-South relations is clearly a legacy of colonialism, although it has developed in new ways after formal decolonisation and exists within the modern international system of sovereign states and norms of universal equality and rights. It is obvious that colonialism was a thoroughly racialised structure of North-South relations. However, while modern North-South relations are characterised by enduring conditions of inequality and dependency, they do not appear to be racialised. This paper uses critical realist ontology as a basis for revealing the persistence of race in a system of apparently de-racialised North-South and international relations. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
intern (127), relat (111), race (89), social (85), structur (54), european (54), peopl (53), law (52), theori (52), form (50), critic (50), coloni (48), state (46), ir (46), ontolog (40), world (40), racialis (40), see (39), develop (39), power (38), non (37), |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Gruffydd Jones, Branwen. "Race in the Ontology of North-South Relations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA, Mar 22, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p98742_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Gruffydd Jones, B. , 2006-03-22 "Race in the Ontology of North-South Relations" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p98742_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The discipline of IR as it developed during the twentieth century was for the most part overwhelmingly eurocentric. The eurocentric character of IR, which is finally being given increasing attention by critical scholars, included a relative marginalisation of the question of North-South relations. Rather than recognising the centrality of relations of imperialism and colonialism to the structures, regulation and discourses of international relations over five centuries, North-South relations were considered at best a particular ?issue-area? of concern mainly to the subfield of IPE. This marginalisation of north-south relations has extended further to a blindness regarding the question of race in international relations. This paper considers the centrality of race in the historical development and reproduction of international relations. In order to do so it is necessary to re-think underlying assumptions regarding units of analysis and our basic model of social reality, including questions of cause and its extension in time and space. In other words, we need to reconsider the assumed ontology underlying and informing the study of international relations. It is in part the empiricist ontology underlying the mainstream of IR which has led to the lack of recognition of race in contemporary international relations. The paper outlines a more adequate theory of ontology, informed by critical realism, which can form the basis for a critical analysis of the international relations of race and the racialised form of international relations. The contemporary structure of North-South relations is clearly a legacy of colonialism, although it has developed in new ways after formal decolonisation and exists within the modern international system of sovereign states and norms of universal equality and rights. It is obvious that colonialism was a thoroughly racialised structure of North-South relations. However, while modern North-South relations are characterised by enduring conditions of inequality and dependency, they do not appear to be racialised. This paper uses critical realist ontology as a basis for revealing the persistence of race in a system of apparently de-racialised North-South and international relations. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
24 |
| Word count: |
12548 |
| Text sample: |
| Race in the Ontology of North-South Relations Branwen Gruffydd Jones1 Paper presented on the panel: ‘The North-South Divide: A Scientific Realist Perspective’ at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association San Diego California 22-25 March 2006 This paper is a draft work-in-progress. Please do not cite without author’s permission. Introduction: Ontology Race and International Order The contemporary structure of North-South relations is clearly a legacy of European expansion slavery and colonialism although it has developed in new ways |
| upheld until 1992 when the judgement in the landmark case Mabo v Queensland no 2 finally recognised the legitimacy of the historical claims of the Murray Islanders to their traditional lands (see Reynolds 1996 chapter 1). Justice Brennan in rejecting the case of the Queensland Government observed ‘The fiction by which the rights and interests of indigenous inhabitants in land were treated as non- existent was justified by a policy which has no place in the contemporary law of |
Similar Titles:
The European Union as a Critic of the International Order: The Power of a Normative Power
European Modernity and the History of the State: Reflections on the Historical and Ontological Basis of International Relations Theory
Model Theory & International Relations Theory: Positivism, Ontology and the Nature of Social Science
|
|