Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p99430_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Highum, Erick. ""Success vs Failure in International Environmental Treaty Negotiations: A Comparative Analysis of the Montreal Protocol and Global Climate Change Negotiations."" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA, Mar 22, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p99430_index.html>

Highum, E. G. , 2006-03-22 ""Success vs Failure in International Environmental Treaty Negotiations: A Comparative Analysis of the Montreal Protocol and Global Climate Change Negotiations."" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA Online <PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p99430_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: This paper will provide a comparative analysis of the factors that led to success versus failure in international environmental treaty negotiations. The two cases reviewed are the Montreal Protocol negotiations on ozone layer depletion and the Kyoto Protocol negotiations on global climate change. In both cases I will use the following factors as a means of evaluating the success of the Montreal Protocol and the failure of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations at the time these negotiations took place. The factors are: the role of science; the power of knowledge and of public opinion; the activities of multilateral institutions; an individual nation's policies and leadership; the role of private sector organizations; the negotiation process; and the flexibility and dynamic of the treaty instrument (Benedick, 1998).

The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol

The Political Economy of Climate Change Policy: Did States Defend Their Material Interests When Negotiating the Kyoto Protocol?