|
|
|
|
An ?Austere? Look at Economic Liberalization, Human Rights, and Democracy |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
|
Abstract:
|
In this paper, we examine the effects of structural adjustment policies (SAPs) on the democratic practices of loan recipient governments, using a dataset of 159 countries from 1981-2004. To meet the conditions of World Bank and IMF SAPs, recipient governments must cut back on public employment and reduce government spending in the areas of health, housing, education, and welfare. Leaders of the World Bank, IMF, and first world governments contend that the governments of third world countries must undertake these policies if they want to cure their economic problems. According to this perspective, improved human rights practices will be one of the many benefits of achieving a higher level of economic development. Rapley (2002), Stiglitz (2002), Vreeland (2003), and many other critics of SAPs argue that these programs have worsened the economic situations within recipient states. Preliminary evidence shows that SAPs undermine democracy and human rights movements in developing countries. SAP-related reductions in state services hurt the most vulnerable members of society. Citizens who have lost these protections often increase their anti-government activity. These challenges to government policies, in turn, often provoke government repression and institutional changes reducing "democraticness." The reductions in democraticness hold for both the short and long-term. |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: International Studies Association URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Cingranelli, David. and Abouharb, M. Rodwan. "An ?Austere? Look at Economic Liberalization, Human Rights, and Democracy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA, Mar 22, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100231_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Cingranelli, D. L. and Abouharb, M. , 2006-03-22 "An ?Austere? Look at Economic Liberalization, Human Rights, and Democracy" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100231_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: In this paper, we examine the effects of structural adjustment policies (SAPs) on the democratic practices of loan recipient governments, using a dataset of 159 countries from 1981-2004. To meet the conditions of World Bank and IMF SAPs, recipient governments must cut back on public employment and reduce government spending in the areas of health, housing, education, and welfare. Leaders of the World Bank, IMF, and first world governments contend that the governments of third world countries must undertake these policies if they want to cure their economic problems. According to this perspective, improved human rights practices will be one of the many benefits of achieving a higher level of economic development. Rapley (2002), Stiglitz (2002), Vreeland (2003), and many other critics of SAPs argue that these programs have worsened the economic situations within recipient states. Preliminary evidence shows that SAPs undermine democracy and human rights movements in developing countries. SAP-related reductions in state services hurt the most vulnerable members of society. Citizens who have lost these protections often increase their anti-government activity. These challenges to government policies, in turn, often provoke government repression and institutional changes reducing "democraticness." The reductions in democraticness hold for both the short and long-term. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
Similar Titles:
Hermeneutics and Human Rights: Catholicism, Islam, and Liberal Democracy
Structural Adjustment Programs, Economic Liberalization and Respect for Human Rights
The Challenge of Diversity: Human Rights, Human Dignity, and Liberal Democracies
|
|