Citation

Military Intervention and the Humanitarian "Force Multiplier"

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Humanitarian organizations and human rights groups frequently call for increased political and military action in conflict zones and civil wars. Currently, those groups are demanding increased engagement in the civil war in the Darfur region of Sudan. Aid organizations, such as Doctors without Borders, also urged NATO to intervene in Kosovo in the 1990s. NGOs and human rights activists condemned Western states and the United Nations for their passivity during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. But in other situations, particularly Iraq, these same organizations condemn Western (specifically US) intervention as destructive and unjust. The current intervention in Afghanistan has caused a division in the humanitarian groups. Some advocate for expanded NATO and US presence; others for a withdrawal. Calls for political or military action clearly erode the traditional neutrality of humanitarian organizations during civil wars. Such new patterns of humanitarian action raise a number of questions: How does vocal support or condemnation of policy affect perceptions of humanitarian actors by interveners, combatants, and local civilians? What is the impact on the conflict and on the security of aid workers? Is the changing role of NGOs related to a changing nature of warfare? This paper develops explanations for humanitarian action during civil wars and, in particular, examines the nexus between civil war, military intervention, and humanitarian organizations. The paper draws examples from cases of intervention (Iraq, Afghanistan, Kosovo) and non-intervention (Sudan, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo) and also compares the differences among humanitarian organizations in each situation.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

humanitarian (214), militari (117), aid (105), organ (69), ngos (65), polit (54), secur (52), forc (50), govern (49), intervent (46), afghanistan (40), iraq (40), worker (35), activ (35), war (34), state (32), neutral (31), lischer (30), action (29), oper (27), intern (27),

Author's Keywords:

civil war, intervention, humanitarian, NGO, UN, Iraq
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: International Studies Association
URL:
http://www.isanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100239_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Lischer, Sarah. "Military Intervention and the Humanitarian "Force Multiplier"" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA, Mar 22, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-25 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100239_index.html>

APA Citation:

Lischer, S. K. , 2006-03-22 "Military Intervention and the Humanitarian "Force Multiplier"" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, California, USA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-25 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p100239_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Humanitarian organizations and human rights groups frequently call for increased political and military action in conflict zones and civil wars. Currently, those groups are demanding increased engagement in the civil war in the Darfur region of Sudan. Aid organizations, such as Doctors without Borders, also urged NATO to intervene in Kosovo in the 1990s. NGOs and human rights activists condemned Western states and the United Nations for their passivity during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. But in other situations, particularly Iraq, these same organizations condemn Western (specifically US) intervention as destructive and unjust. The current intervention in Afghanistan has caused a division in the humanitarian groups. Some advocate for expanded NATO and US presence; others for a withdrawal. Calls for political or military action clearly erode the traditional neutrality of humanitarian organizations during civil wars. Such new patterns of humanitarian action raise a number of questions: How does vocal support or condemnation of policy affect perceptions of humanitarian actors by interveners, combatants, and local civilians? What is the impact on the conflict and on the security of aid workers? Is the changing role of NGOs related to a changing nature of warfare? This paper develops explanations for humanitarian action during civil wars and, in particular, examines the nexus between civil war, military intervention, and humanitarian organizations. The paper draws examples from cases of intervention (Iraq, Afghanistan, Kosovo) and non-intervention (Sudan, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo) and also compares the differences among humanitarian organizations in each situation.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Abstract Only All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Political Research Online
Associated Document Available International Studies Association

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 29
Word count: 7737
Text sample:
Forthcoming in Global Governance Military Intervention and the Humanitarian “Force Multiplier” Sarah Kenyon Lischer Dept of Political Science Wake Forest University PO Box 7568 Winston-Salem NC 27106 lischesk@wfu.edu Abstract: Recent military interventions in Kosovo Afghanistan and Iraq have sparked controversy by using humanitarian aid to further military goals. In 1999 NATO forces set up refugee camps for fleeing Kosovars even as NATO fighter pilots attacked Yugoslavia. American planes dropped both cluster bombs and food packets in Afghanistan in 2001.
Basic Books 2002) 371-372. 38 Reuters Alertnet.org “Save the Children USA Remains in Darfur Save the Children UK Withdraws ” Dec. 22 2004. Found at http://www.altertnet.org; Reuters Alertnet.org “Sudanese MSF Aid Worker Killed in South Darfur ” Dec. 22 2004. Found at http://www.altertnet.org. 39 Somini Sengupta “Despite Pact New Violence Stymies Aid in Sudan ” New York Times Nov. 27 2004; Finbarr O’Rielly “Sudan Army Surrounds Darfur Camps Aid Agency Says ” Reuters Nov. 2 2004. 40 Reuters “Sudan


Similar Titles:
Civil-Military Practices in Post-Conflict Reconstruction:The Interaction Between External Military Forces and Local Social Systems in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq

Military Duel, Police Operation or Struggle over Legitimacy? Symbolical Mediation in Security and Stabilisation Operations in Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.