Citation

Honey, Did You Buy the Condoms?: Long-Term Sexual Relationships’ Influence on Contraceptive Behavior

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Despite concern with sex-related topics, such as fertility and family life, demographers have rarely addressed sex in their research and theorizing, except when studying adolescents. Consequently, the models demographers use to understand fertility decision-making have operated under the assumption that “coital frequency” is nothing more than a “proximate determinant” of fertility. The theoretical position of this paper is that sex (not merely defined as “coital frequency”) is actually a key determinant of fertility and subsequent fertility decision-making. However, I argue that the influence of sex on fertility decision-making is slightly different in short- and long-term relationships; this paper focuses on the influence of sex in contraceptive decision-making in long-term relationships. I conduct multinomial regression analyses using data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth to demonstrate that previous contraceptive use in a relationship affects and predicts current contraceptive use in that relationship. Moreover, I show that these effects differ by the type of method used, with a contrast between barrier and hormonal methods, and that the sexual context matters for women of all ages, not just adolescents.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

contracept (137), month (122), use (117), relationship (56), method (50), 1 (46), 2 (41), sex (38), hormon (34), barrier (32), sexual (32), women (28), time (28), first (27), odd (26), partner (24), term (24), 3 (23), consist (23), previous (22), 0.0001 (22),

Author's Keywords:

fertility decision-making, contraception, sex, relationships
Convention
Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Sociological Association
URL:
http://www.asanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p101690_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Fennell, Julie. "Honey, Did You Buy the Condoms?: Long-Term Sexual Relationships’ Influence on Contraceptive Behavior" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug 10, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p101690_index.html>

APA Citation:

Fennell, J. L. , 2006-08-10 "Honey, Did You Buy the Condoms?: Long-Term Sexual Relationships’ Influence on Contraceptive Behavior" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p101690_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Despite concern with sex-related topics, such as fertility and family life, demographers have rarely addressed sex in their research and theorizing, except when studying adolescents. Consequently, the models demographers use to understand fertility decision-making have operated under the assumption that “coital frequency” is nothing more than a “proximate determinant” of fertility. The theoretical position of this paper is that sex (not merely defined as “coital frequency”) is actually a key determinant of fertility and subsequent fertility decision-making. However, I argue that the influence of sex on fertility decision-making is slightly different in short- and long-term relationships; this paper focuses on the influence of sex in contraceptive decision-making in long-term relationships. I conduct multinomial regression analyses using data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth to demonstrate that previous contraceptive use in a relationship affects and predicts current contraceptive use in that relationship. Moreover, I show that these effects differ by the type of method used, with a contrast between barrier and hormonal methods, and that the sexual context matters for women of all ages, not just adolescents.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Sociological Association

Document Type: application/pdf
Page count: 20
Word count: 5219
Text sample:
Fennell 1 Introduction Despite concern with sex-related topics such as fertility and family life demographers have rarely addressed sex in their research and theorizing except when studying adolescents (McDaniel 1996; Watkins 1993). Consequently the models demographers use to understand fertility decision-making have operated under the assumption that “coital frequency†is nothing more than a “proximate determinant†of fertility (Bongaarts 1978). The theoretical position of this paper is that sex (not merely defined as “coital frequencyâ€) is actually a key
2005. “Critical Issues in Contraceptive and STI Acceptability Research.†Journal of Social Issues. 61(1): 45-65. Unger Jennifer B; Molina Gregory B. 1998. “Contraceptive Use among Latina Women: Social Cultural and Demographic Correlates.†Women's Health Issues. 8(6): 359-369. Watkins Susan C. 1993. “If All We Knew About Women Was What We Read in Demography What Would We Know?†Demography. 30(4): 551-577. Weisman Carol S. et al. 1991. “Adolescent Women' Contraceptive Decision Making.†s Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 32(2):


Similar Titles:
Why Not Communicate? Young Women's Reflections on Their Lack of Communication with Sexual Partners Regarding Sex and Contraception: A Qualitative Analysis

Contraceptive Consistency Within First Sexual Relationships

The Role of Victim & Offender Relationships in Predicting Fear of Rape & Nonsexual Crimes among College Women: Testing the Shadow of Sexual Assault Hypothesis


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.