Citation

Patterns of Asexuality in the United States

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

In this article we use data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) to ascertain and analyze patterns of asexuality in the United States. We first discuss definitions of asexuality. The limited literature on asexuality presents three kinds of definitions dealing with sexuality, namely, definitions based on one’s behavior, desires, and self-identification. Given the several definitions, we use a social constructionist perspective in this analysis, as against an essentialist approach, and measure the phenomenon in several ways. We then present a review of the literature on asexuality. We know of only one truly nationally representative study of asexuality, a survey of 18,000 British residents undertaken in the early 1990s by Johnson and colleagues (1994) and analyzed later by Bogaert (2004). We discuss its major findings and conclusions. We turn next to the 2002 NSFG, discuss briefly its approach, conduct and data, and show the three NSFG questions we will use to measure asexuality; two provide imperfect data on asexuality, and one provides quite good data. We then use the NSFG respondent sampling weights to produce several sets of unbiased estimates of the percentages of persons in the U.S. population, aged 15-44, who are asexual. Each set of estimates is based on one of the three definitions of asexuality. Finally, we use the three definitions of asexuality and develop seven groups or categories of asexuals, depending on their answers to the three questions. We compare and contrast the characteristics of asexuals in each group with those of sexuals.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

asexu (192), sexual (120), behavior (56), desir (55), male (54), femal (50), identif (47), use (44), respons (43), question (42), self (39), person (39), respond (39), sex (37), one (34), 2002 (33), attract (30), marri (28), cohabit (28), would (28), nsfg (28),

Author's Keywords:

asexuality, sexuality, NSFG
Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Sociological Association
URL:
http://www.asanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p103402_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Poston, Dudley. and Baumle, Amanda. "Patterns of Asexuality in the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug 11, 2006 <Not Available>. 2009-05-24 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p103402_index.html>

APA Citation:

Poston, D. L. and Baumle, A. K. , 2006-08-11 "Patterns of Asexuality in the United States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Online <PDF>. 2009-05-24 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p103402_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: In this article we use data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) to ascertain and analyze patterns of asexuality in the United States. We first discuss definitions of asexuality. The limited literature on asexuality presents three kinds of definitions dealing with sexuality, namely, definitions based on one’s behavior, desires, and self-identification. Given the several definitions, we use a social constructionist perspective in this analysis, as against an essentialist approach, and measure the phenomenon in several ways. We then present a review of the literature on asexuality. We know of only one truly nationally representative study of asexuality, a survey of 18,000 British residents undertaken in the early 1990s by Johnson and colleagues (1994) and analyzed later by Bogaert (2004). We discuss its major findings and conclusions. We turn next to the 2002 NSFG, discuss briefly its approach, conduct and data, and show the three NSFG questions we will use to measure asexuality; two provide imperfect data on asexuality, and one provides quite good data. We then use the NSFG respondent sampling weights to produce several sets of unbiased estimates of the percentages of persons in the U.S. population, aged 15-44, who are asexual. Each set of estimates is based on one of the three definitions of asexuality. Finally, we use the three definitions of asexuality and develop seven groups or categories of asexuals, depending on their answers to the three questions. We compare and contrast the characteristics of asexuals in each group with those of sexuals.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Sociological Association

Document Type: PDF
Page count: 20
Word count: 7131
Text sample:
Patterns of Asexuality in the United States Dudley L. Poston Jr. and Amanda K. Baumle Department of Sociology Texas A&M University e-mail: dudleyposton@yahoo.com Introduction In this article we use data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) (National Center for Health Statistics 2004) to ascertain and analyze patterns of asexuality in the United States. We first discuss various definitions of asexuality. The limited literature on asexuality presents three kinds of definitions dealing with sexuality namely definitions based
2.1 0.9% (9) Behave & ID 4.4 0.6% 2.1% (4) 19.0% (15) (127) Behave & 1.0 Desire Desire Identity ID & Desire 0.6 NOTE: percentages are w eighted; Beh. &Des. &ID 0.9 frequencies are unw eighted Total 100.0 20


Similar Titles:
Relationship between Sexual Self-Schema, Relationship Satisfaction, Body Objectification, Overall Health and Female Sexual Function

Attitudes Toward the Criminal Legal System: A Mediator Between Personality and Behavior for Males and Females

Ad-Inspired Social Comparison Behavior and Notions Regarding Physical Attractiveness: A Comparison of Japanese Female and Male Teenagers

Sexual Self-Esteem and Sexual Risk Behavior: Impact of Abuse, Family Communication, and Media

Comparing self report to latency to respond on political attitude questions with socially desirable outcomes on an Internet-based survey


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.