|
|
|
|
Rewarding Care, Citizenship, or Marriage? Gender, Race, Class, and Social Security Reform |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Most North American and European countries are undergoing dramatic demographic changes, particularly increases in women’s paid labor force participation and the retreat from marriage. These trends have fed calls to reform welfare state benefit structures in these countries. Altering welfare state policies, however, will impact how benefit distribution shapes gender, race, and class inequalities. Social Security reform in the United States provides a case study to examine how different reform typologies would impact inequality. The literature focused on welfare state typologies and distribution has paid careful attention to gender and class inequalities, but has been less successful in considering the impact on race and class inequities among women. There are two types of reforms to Social Security that would be focused on gender-based inequalities. Welfare states could attempt to spread the risks associated with marital dissolution or they could reward unpaid family care work. A reform focused largely on class-based inequality would be to introduce a citizenship-based minimum benefit. I analyze how gender-based versus-class based reforms impact inequities among women. I use the 1992 Health and Retirement Study with merged Social Security earnings’ data to quantitatively evaluate the impact of these reforms on the distribution of benefits among women. Using an altered two-part model (Manning et al. 1987), I find that moving away from marital status, even a benefit that helps soften the negative economic impact of marital dissolution, and towards care or citizenship will produce the most progressive benefit structure for future cohorts of beneficiaries. But it is also clear that benefits focused on reducing class inequalities, such as a citizenship based minimum benefit, as opposed to gender inequalities, are the most successful at softening race and class inequalities among both present and future cohorts of beneficiaries. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
women (255), benefit (255), care (84), earn (80), reform (67), marit (65), social (65), secur (63), percent (61), increas (60), divorc (57), marri (55), year (54), citizen (49), base (47), receiv (42), age (42), quartil (38), widow (34), 0 (34), state (33), |
|
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Herd, Pamela. "Rewarding Care, Citizenship, or Marriage? Gender, Race, Class, and Social Security Reform" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta Hilton Hotel, Atlanta, GA, Aug 16, 2003 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p107221_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Herd, P. , 2003-08-16 "Rewarding Care, Citizenship, or Marriage? Gender, Race, Class, and Social Security Reform" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta Hilton Hotel, Atlanta, GA Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p107221_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Most North American and European countries are undergoing dramatic demographic changes, particularly increases in women’s paid labor force participation and the retreat from marriage. These trends have fed calls to reform welfare state benefit structures in these countries. Altering welfare state policies, however, will impact how benefit distribution shapes gender, race, and class inequalities. Social Security reform in the United States provides a case study to examine how different reform typologies would impact inequality. The literature focused on welfare state typologies and distribution has paid careful attention to gender and class inequalities, but has been less successful in considering the impact on race and class inequities among women. There are two types of reforms to Social Security that would be focused on gender-based inequalities. Welfare states could attempt to spread the risks associated with marital dissolution or they could reward unpaid family care work. A reform focused largely on class-based inequality would be to introduce a citizenship-based minimum benefit. I analyze how gender-based versus-class based reforms impact inequities among women. I use the 1992 Health and Retirement Study with merged Social Security earnings’ data to quantitatively evaluate the impact of these reforms on the distribution of benefits among women. Using an altered two-part model (Manning et al. 1987), I find that moving away from marital status, even a benefit that helps soften the negative economic impact of marital dissolution, and towards care or citizenship will produce the most progressive benefit structure for future cohorts of beneficiaries. But it is also clear that benefits focused on reducing class inequalities, such as a citizenship based minimum benefit, as opposed to gender inequalities, are the most successful at softening race and class inequalities among both present and future cohorts of beneficiaries. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
27 |
| Word count: |
10450 |
| Text sample: |
| Rewarding Care Citizenship or Marriage?: Gender Race Class and Social Security Reform Pamela Herd Ph.D. University of Michigan Ann Arbor ABSTRACT Most North American and European countries are undergoing dramatic demographic changes particularly increases in women’s paid labor force participation and the retreat from marriage. These trends have fed calls to reform welfare state benefit structures in these countries. Altering welfare state policies however will impact how benefit distribution shapes gender race and class inequalities. Social Security reform in |
| Data Query. http://data.bls.gov. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. “America’s Family and Living Arrangements: Population Characteristics.” Current Population Reports P20-537. U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Current Population Survey March. http://ferret.bls.census.gov. U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare (U.S. DHEW). 1979. Social Security and the Changing Roles of Men and Women. Washington DC. U.S. Department of Labor. 1997. Facts on Working Women: Black Women in the Labor Force. http://www.dol.gov./dol/wb/public/wb_pubs/bwlf97.html. Waldfogel Jane. 1997. “The Effect of Children on Women’s Wages.” American Sociological Review.” American |
Similar Titles:
Privatizing a Promise: Social Security Reform and African American Women
State in Mind: The Republican Bases of American State-led Social Reform and Development: 1877-1900
|
|