|
|
|
|
Collaborative Learning or Free Riders' Fantasy?: The Impact of Group Projects on Examination Performance in Social Statistics |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Many sociologists have endorsed group or collaborative learning strategies for teaching college level methods and statistics courses, but few researchers provide empirical evidence that students’ quantitative skills actually increase as a result of the collaborative experience. Assessment of the effectiveness of collaborative teaching techniques is frequently subjectively based and often relies on casual comments from students or faculty. Despite this shortcoming, sociologists searching for new and effective ways of teaching quantitative courses continue to experiment with collaborative pedagogy. Consequently, an exploration of the efficacy of group or collaborative teaching modalities on student learning of social statistics warrants attention. This study examines the relationship between collaborative assignments and students’ statistical skills and knowledge. Data were derived from 233 students enrolled in eight sections of a social statistics course taught between 1996 and 2003. The results both challenge and support the efficacy of collaborative learning and suggest that faculty modify such techniques when evidence of student learning cannot be empirically linked to the collaborative experience. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
group (134), student (132), project (98), 1 (80), examin (79), statist (71), teach (62), collabor (54), cours (54), score (53), learn (51), 2 (50), social (44), sociolog (40), effect (39), equat (36), variabl (34), quiz (32), final (31), mean (28), point (25), |
Author's Keywords:
|
collaborative learning, group projects, free riders, teaching social statistics |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Delucchi, Michael. "Collaborative Learning or Free Riders' Fantasy?: The Impact of Group Projects on Examination Performance in Social Statistics" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA,, Aug 14, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p108619_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Delucchi, M. , 2004-08-14 "Collaborative Learning or Free Riders' Fantasy?: The Impact of Group Projects on Examination Performance in Social Statistics" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA, Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p108619_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Many sociologists have endorsed group or collaborative learning strategies for teaching college level methods and statistics courses, but few researchers provide empirical evidence that students’ quantitative skills actually increase as a result of the collaborative experience. Assessment of the effectiveness of collaborative teaching techniques is frequently subjectively based and often relies on casual comments from students or faculty. Despite this shortcoming, sociologists searching for new and effective ways of teaching quantitative courses continue to experiment with collaborative pedagogy. Consequently, an exploration of the efficacy of group or collaborative teaching modalities on student learning of social statistics warrants attention. This study examines the relationship between collaborative assignments and students’ statistical skills and knowledge. Data were derived from 233 students enrolled in eight sections of a social statistics course taught between 1996 and 2003. The results both challenge and support the efficacy of collaborative learning and suggest that faculty modify such techniques when evidence of student learning cannot be empirically linked to the collaborative experience. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
29 |
| Word count: |
6337 |
| Text sample: |
| COLLABORATIVE LEARNING OR FREE RIDERS’ FANTASY?: THE IMPACT OF GROUP PROJECTS ON EXAMINATION PERFORMANCE IN SOCIAL STATISTICS* by Michael Delucchi Ph.D. University of Hawaii – West Oahu Running Head: Collaborative Learning or Free Riders’ Fantasy? Word Count: 6 284 December 20 2003 *I would like to thank Audri Beugelsdijk for assistance with data entry and Kyle Cabral for library research. Thanks for their comments on earlier versions of this manuscript to Orlando Olivares and Susan Pelowski. Please address all |
| .05 .03 .23** .11 .04 .13 .05 1.00 X7 .09 .02 -.03 .07 .09 -.01 .11 -.09 1.00 X8 -.10 -.06 -.16* -.09 -.03 .08 -.05 .17* -.48** 1.00 X9 .13 .09 .14* .09 .07 .10 -.30 -.08 -.28** -.24** 1.00 X10 -.05 -.09 -.08 -.15* -.14* -.11 -.05 -.15* -.09 .04 .05 1.00 X11 .03 .09 .24** .16** .16* .05 .06 .07 .18** -.03 -.06 .05 1.00 X12 -.01 -.06 .07 .03 -.03 -.04 -.04 -.18* .07 -.18** |
Similar Titles:
Connecting Effective Teaching and Student Learning Using the Pirie-Kieren Theory of Students’ Growth of Understanding
It Takes a Community to Educate a Student: Emotive-Collaborative Learning and Learning Communities connecting Sociology, History and Political Science
Student Learning in Introduction to Sociology: Impact of Discussion Group on Development of Sociological Imagination
|
|