Author's Keywords: qualitative interview, interview preparation,	Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109148_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Laudel, Grit. and Gl�ser, Jochen. ""Native Competence" in Qualitative Interviewing" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA,, Aug 14, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109148_index.html>

Laudel, G. and Gl�ser, J. , 2004-08-14 ""Native Competence" in Qualitative Interviewing" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA, Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109148_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: With this article, we want to discuss a methodological problem central to many empirical investigations, namely the question to what extent investigators must be informed about their subjects� practices, and how that knowledge can be acquired. We argue that some social settings, among them the professions, are characterised by their reliance on knowledge that is being acquired by a specific external training process. This puts the investigator at a principal disadvantage, because she cannot acquire all knowledge that is necessary to understand the subjects� practices. Using our research in the sociology of science as an example, we discuss three reasons why qualitative interviews should be conducted in a scientifically informed manner: the necessity to take into account epistemic conditions of action in sociological explanations; the necessity to �operationalise� the research questions; and the necessity to achieve the required depth in qualitative interviewing. In our attempts to conduct �informed interviewing�, we encountered three basic tasks: preparing the interview by acquiring scientific knowledge, preparing and suggesting a language for communication (an ad-hoc pidgin), and negotiating a level of scientific understanding in the introductory sequence of the interview. We make suggestions on how to solve these tasks, and discuss limitations of the approach of informed interviewing.

Occupational Conditions, Socializing at Work, and Informal Social Support: Different Dynamics for Men and Women

Preliminary field research in Canada's North: Methodological observations, alchemy and anxieties in social scientific research

The Human Subject in International Studies: An Outline of Research Programmes Extending to the Humanities, Sciences and Social Sciences