|
|
|
|
State Actor, Class Representative, or Interest Group? Subnational Government Organizations in National Policy Domains |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Subnational government organizations have long sought to influence national policy-making. Yet, our understanding of their interest representation, and function in national policy domains is, at best, limited. Such organizations have traditionally been thought to represent subnational-state interests, and to function as interest groups within the federal arena. A problem with this perspective is that it fails to consider that subnational government organizations are comprised of elite-state actors, whose ties to the nation-state make them qualitatively distinct from other interest groups. Of the many perspectives concerning political process and policy-making, state-centered approaches and neo-Marxist approaches have the most to offer from a theoretical perspective, because they consider the possibility that subnational government organizations may constitute either state or elite-class actors with regard to the policy-making process. In order to more fully understand the interest representation and function of these organizations, as well as their ability to influence national policy-making, I propose examining the efforts of the National Governors Association (NGA) to transform welfare policy, during the Reagan, G. W. Bush, and Clinton Presidencies. As leaders in the welfare policy domain, the NGA crafted new federal welfare legislation in 1988, the Family Support Act, and were key participants in the debates surrounding the (1996) Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. Such research will contribute not only to existing studies on subnational government organizations, but also more broadly to our understanding of political process and policy-making within the United States. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
state (255), polici (171), interest (133), group (124), organ (97), govern (86), actor (77), welfar (77), subnat (68), class (67), polit (67), nation (65), make (57), elit (54), feder (49), perspect (41), social (40), approach (40), repres (40), program (36), may (36), |
Author's Keywords:
|
political process, policy-making, subnational government organizations, welfare reform |
|
 | Convention | | Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Hicks, Carson. "State Actor, Class Representative, or Interest Group? Subnational Government Organizations in National Policy Domains" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA,, Aug 14, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109289_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Hicks, C. , 2004-08-14 "State Actor, Class Representative, or Interest Group? Subnational Government Organizations in National Policy Domains" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA, Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109289_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Subnational government organizations have long sought to influence national policy-making. Yet, our understanding of their interest representation, and function in national policy domains is, at best, limited. Such organizations have traditionally been thought to represent subnational-state interests, and to function as interest groups within the federal arena. A problem with this perspective is that it fails to consider that subnational government organizations are comprised of elite-state actors, whose ties to the nation-state make them qualitatively distinct from other interest groups. Of the many perspectives concerning political process and policy-making, state-centered approaches and neo-Marxist approaches have the most to offer from a theoretical perspective, because they consider the possibility that subnational government organizations may constitute either state or elite-class actors with regard to the policy-making process. In order to more fully understand the interest representation and function of these organizations, as well as their ability to influence national policy-making, I propose examining the efforts of the National Governors Association (NGA) to transform welfare policy, during the Reagan, G. W. Bush, and Clinton Presidencies. As leaders in the welfare policy domain, the NGA crafted new federal welfare legislation in 1988, the Family Support Act, and were key participants in the debates surrounding the (1996) Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. Such research will contribute not only to existing studies on subnational government organizations, but also more broadly to our understanding of political process and policy-making within the United States. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
24 |
| Word count: |
10168 |
| Text sample: |
| State Actor Class Representative or Interest Group? Subnational Government Organizations in National Policy Domains Carson Hicks Columbia University Department of Sociology E-Mail: cch30@columbia.edu Telephone: 212-580-5796 January 2004 “A compulsory political organization will be called a “state” insofar as its administrative staff successfully upholds the claim to the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force in the enforcement of its order. Social action especially organized action will be spoken of as “politically oriented” if it aims at exerting influence |
| Publications Inc. Weiss Robert S. 1994. Learning From Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press. Weissert Carol S. 1991. "Policy Entrepreneurs Policy Opportunists and Legislative Effectiveness." American Politics Quarterly 19:262-274. —. 2000. "Learning from Midwestern Leaders." in Learning from the Leaders: Welfare Reform and Policy in Five Midwestern States edited by Carol S. Weissert. Albany New York: Rockefeller Institute Press. Ziegler Harmon. 1964. Interest Groups In American Society. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice- |
Similar Titles:
Intergovernmental Interest Groups: Horizontal Federalsim and Federal Preemption in Reverse as an Alternative Form of National Policy-Making
State Supreme Courts and the Political Environment:How Interest Group Participation Influences State Policy-Making
|
|