All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

(Re)Defining Sexual Victimization: An Analysis of Non-Classifying Incidents Reported to the National Crime Victimization Survey
Unformatted Document Text:  3 is not surprising that victims’ interpretations of their incidents often contradict the legal definitions that many researchers use to measure sexual assault. But whose definitions should ultimately determine when victimization has occurred -- researchers using legal (i.e., objective) definitions or respondents themselves? Can someone be the victim of a sexual crime without themselves thinking of it as such? Conversely, can someone be considered a “real” victim if the situations they report are not considered criminal by the larger society? In short, should legal definitions override individuals’ own definitions of their situations? 3 After merely 15 years of debating the accuracy of sexual assault estimates, the methodological questions remain: are researchers defining deviance up (i.e., labeling normal sexual behavior as deviant) as critics allege, or are respondents defining deviance down (i.e., interpreting deviant behaviors as normal) as feminist researchers claim? 4 How do victims 5 really view their sexually coercive experiences? While it is impossible to know what the respondents in previous studies were thinking as they answered questions regarding their sexual experiences, the proposed research project seeks to explore this largely unexamined cognitive context of victimization. Overall, this project seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the scope and context of sexual victimization based primarily on victims’ own definitions of their situations. It does so by utilizing victim narratives from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), a large-scale probability survey of persons 12 years and older. The NCVS narratives are little-known and largely unexplored qualitative responses collected as part of the NCVS survey interview, and where respondents are 3 As part of her criticism of violence-against-women research, Sommers (1994) asks “Since when do feminists consider law to override women’s experience?” (214). 4 The terms defining deviance up and defining deviance down are attributed to Charles Krauthammer (1993) and Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1993) respectively. 5 The term victim is used to refer to survey respondents who report any sexual victimization incident to the NCVS, regardless of whether or not they consider the incident to be a crime or self-identify as victims.

Authors: Weiss, Karen.
first   previous   Page 3 of 16   next   last



background image
3
is not surprising that victims’ interpretations of their incidents often contradict the legal definitions
that many researchers use to measure sexual assault. But whose definitions should ultimately
determine when victimization has occurred -- researchers using legal (i.e., objective) definitions or
respondents themselves? Can someone be the victim of a sexual crime without themselves
thinking of it as such? Conversely, can someone be considered a “real” victim if the situations
they report are not considered criminal by the larger society? In short, should legal definitions
override individuals’ own definitions of their situations?
3
After merely 15 years of debating the accuracy of sexual assault estimates, the
methodological questions remain: are researchers defining deviance up (i.e., labeling normal sexual
behavior as deviant) as critics allege, or are respondents defining deviance down (i.e., interpreting
deviant behaviors as normal) as feminist researchers claim?
4
How do victims
5
really view their
sexually coercive experiences? While it is impossible to know what the respondents in previous
studies were thinking as they answered questions regarding their sexual experiences, the proposed
research project seeks to explore this largely unexamined cognitive context of victimization.
Overall, this project seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the scope and context of sexual
victimization based primarily on victims’ own definitions of their situations. It does so by utilizing
victim narratives from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), a large-scale probability
survey of persons 12 years and older. The NCVS narratives are little-known and largely unexplored
qualitative responses collected as part of the NCVS survey interview, and where respondents are
3
As part of her criticism of violence-against-women research, Sommers (1994) asks “Since when do feminists
consider law to override women’s experience?” (214).

4
The terms defining deviance up and defining deviance down are attributed to Charles Krauthammer (1993) and
Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1993) respectively.
5
The term victim is used to refer to survey respondents who report any sexual victimization incident to the NCVS,
regardless of whether or not they consider the incident to be a crime or self-identify as victims.


Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 3 of 16   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.