Citation

The Coherence of Public Support for Eight Progressive Social Movements

Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles




STOP!

You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below.

View Document as HTML:
Click here to view the document

Abstract:

Social movement scholars recently have identified several gaps in our knowledge of phenomena such as the general public’s consciousness of movements, the ideological basis of related movements, and the role of public support and public opinion vis-à-vis social movements more generally. We attempt to address these lacunae with public opinion data from a nationally representative April 2000 Gallup poll on the level of goal agreement and perceived impact of eight progressive social movements from the 1960s’ protest cycle. Approximately three decades after the peak of this protest cycle, we find that the American public has come to largely agree with the goals of these eight movements and to see them as having had at least a moderate impact on national policies. More importantly, we find that the progressive social movement belief systems of the general public are characterized by substantial consistency. We argue that such coherence, which presumably results from the centrality of the rights master frame, justifies identification of a progressive social movement orientation—an ideological worldview about the 1960s’ protest cycle.

Most Common Document Word Stems:

movement (255), social (194), public (128), right (108), goal (87), belief (83), progress (80), protest (77), cycl (72), agreement (65), impact (64), frame (62), general (59), correl (56), master (55), eight (50), perceiv (48), support (46), item (45), system (45), examin (41),

Author's Keywords:

social movements, master frames, public support, protest cycles
Convention
Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

Association:
Name: American Sociological Association
URL:
http://www.asanet.org


Citation:
URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109502_index.html
Direct Link:
HTML Code:

MLA Citation:

Dunlap, Riley. and McCright, Aaron. "The Coherence of Public Support for Eight Progressive Social Movements" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA,, Aug 14, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109502_index.html>

APA Citation:

Dunlap, R. E. and McCright, A. , 2004-08-14 "The Coherence of Public Support for Eight Progressive Social Movements" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA, Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109502_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Social movement scholars recently have identified several gaps in our knowledge of phenomena such as the general public’s consciousness of movements, the ideological basis of related movements, and the role of public support and public opinion vis-à-vis social movements more generally. We attempt to address these lacunae with public opinion data from a nationally representative April 2000 Gallup poll on the level of goal agreement and perceived impact of eight progressive social movements from the 1960s’ protest cycle. Approximately three decades after the peak of this protest cycle, we find that the American public has come to largely agree with the goals of these eight movements and to see them as having had at least a moderate impact on national policies. More importantly, we find that the progressive social movement belief systems of the general public are characterized by substantial consistency. We argue that such coherence, which presumably results from the centrality of the rights master frame, justifies identification of a progressive social movement orientation—an ideological worldview about the 1960s’ protest cycle.

Get this Document:

Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.

Associated Document Available Access Fee All Academic Inc.
Associated Document Available Access Fee American Sociological Association

Document Type: .PDF
Page count: 33
Word count: 10607
Text sample:
The Coherence of Public Support for Eight Progressive Social Movements* Aaron M. McCright Environmental Studies Program Department of Sociology The University of Chicago and Riley E. Dunlap Department of Social and Political Sciences Åbo Akademi University (Finland) * Direct correspondence to Aaron M. McCright 6022 South Drexel Avenue #111 Chicago IL 60637 (mccright@uchicago.edu). ABSTRACT Social movement scholars recently have identified several gaps in our knowledge of phenomena such as the general public’s consciousness of movements the ideological basis of
.569 Abortion Rights .442 .501 .586 .655 Gay and Lesbian Rights .415 .444 .652 .597 Cronbach’s Alpha = .765 .759 Eigenvalue = 3.137 3.008 Variance Explained = 39.21% 37.60% Note: We utilize unweighted data when reporting corrected item-total correlations and factor loadings. 31


Similar Titles:
Protest and Profits: A Sectoral Analysis of Social Movement Impact on Business Support for Liberal Rights and the Rule of Law

The Impact of Social Movements on Public Policy; an Analysis of the of the March on Washington of 1963 and the Passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964


 
All Academic, Inc. is your premier source for research and conference management. Visit our website, www.allacademic.com, to see how we can help you today.