Author's Keywords: Social Movements and Cooperation with the State	Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109769_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Landriscina, Mirella. "Why do SMOS Cooperate with the State? Expanding the �Conflictual Cooperation� Model for Incorporated Social Movements." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA,, Aug 14, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109769_index.html>

Landriscina, M. , 2004-08-14 "Why do SMOS Cooperate with the State? Expanding the �Conflictual Cooperation� Model for Incorporated Social Movements." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA, Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p109769_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: This paper extends Giugni and Passy�s (1998) model of how modern Western incorporated social movements interact with the state, a relationship they call �conflictual-cooperation.� Giugni and Passy aim to demonstrate how this relationship can be distinguished from earlier models of movement institutionalization and propose that movements maintain their integrity even when engaging in highly collaborative relationships with the state. I draw from an ethnographic study of homeless service provider and advocacy organizations in Philadelphia to suggest that Giugni and Passy neglected two important dynamics in their discussion. First, in addition to prevailing inclusive strategies by the state, smos must aim at expanding state intervention in society. Second, a cooperative relationship would not only entail the �transfer of knowledge� to the state, but an exchange of information between the two camps. These two dynamics help explain why one of the implications of cooperation is that movements become less likely to engage in protest politics. I hypothesize that the dynamics may obstruct the process of diagnostic framing or the attribution of threat or opportunity (McAdam 2003, p. 291) that makes collective mobilization possible.

Explaining the Survival of Poor People�s Social Movement Organizations: Coalitions, Membership Composition, and Resources

State Party Organizations As Campaign Service Providers: A Three-State Study of Candidate and Party Perceptions

Social Movements and Public Policy: Learning from the Organized LGBT Movement in the United States

Explaining Managerial Behavior in the State-Owned Enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe?s Steel Sector: Collective Action Problem and the Case for Active State Involvement