|
|
|
|
The Gender Difference in 'Don't Know' Responses to Political Attitude Questions: Is It Socialization or Status? |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Previous explanations for the finding that women respond “Don’t Know” more often than men to political attitude questions have focused on sex role socialization. We propose an alternative but complementary explanation for personal interview situations that draws on status characteristics theory. We argue that the interview comprises a two person task- oriented group and that the sex of interviewer as well as sex of respondent should be considered in predicting the level of “Don’t Know” responses. Further, we argue that responding “Don’t Know” represents a failure to contribute an action opportunity to the group task. Since sex operates as a status characteristic and men are accorded higher status than women, we predict that the rate of “Don’t Know” responses will be highest for female respondents with male interviewers. Conversely, male respondents with female interviewers should result in the fewest. Data from the American National Election Surveys of 1988 through 2000 are used to consider the utility of the status characteristics approach relative to that based on sex role socialization. The results of our analyses do not support the status characteristics theory explanation. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
sex (65), respond (46), interview (45), status (33), peopl (32), social (30), femal (29), respons (27), polit (27), male (25), characterist (24), dk (23), point (23), scale (20), theori (19), differ (18), role (17), group (16), opinion (16), 1 (15), much (15), |
Author's Keywords:
|
"don't now" response, political attitudes, gender socialization, status charactristics theory |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: American Sociological Association URL: http://www.asanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Brody, Charles. and Rubin, Beth. "The Gender Difference in 'Don't Know' Responses to Political Attitude Questions: Is It Socialization or Status?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA,, Aug 14, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-05-26 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p110442_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Brody, C. J. and Rubin, B. A. , 2004-08-14 "The Gender Difference in 'Don't Know' Responses to Political Attitude Questions: Is It Socialization or Status?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Hilton San Francisco & Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel, San Francisco, CA, Online <.PDF>. 2009-05-26 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p110442_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Previous explanations for the finding that women respond “Don’t Know” more often than men to political attitude questions have focused on sex role socialization. We propose an alternative but complementary explanation for personal interview situations that draws on status characteristics theory. We argue that the interview comprises a two person task- oriented group and that the sex of interviewer as well as sex of respondent should be considered in predicting the level of “Don’t Know” responses. Further, we argue that responding “Don’t Know” represents a failure to contribute an action opportunity to the group task. Since sex operates as a status characteristic and men are accorded higher status than women, we predict that the rate of “Don’t Know” responses will be highest for female respondents with male interviewers. Conversely, male respondents with female interviewers should result in the fewest. Data from the American National Election Surveys of 1988 through 2000 are used to consider the utility of the status characteristics approach relative to that based on sex role socialization. The results of our analyses do not support the status characteristics theory explanation. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
.PDF |
| Page count: |
15 |
| Word count: |
3270 |
| Text sample: |
| The gender difference in “Don’t Know” responses to political attitude questions: Is it socialization or status? Charles J. Brody Beth A. Rubin University of North Carolina at Charlotte Abstract Previous explanations for the finding that women respond “Don’t Know” more often than men to political attitude questions have focused on sex role socialization. We propose an alternative but complementary explanation for personal interview situations that draws on status characteristics theory. We argue that the interview comprises a two person |
| these people are at the other end of the scale at point number 7.) And of course some other people have opinions somewhere in between at points 2 3 4 5 or 6. Where would you place YOURSELF on this scale or haven’t you thought much about this? Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale at point 1.) Others |
Similar Titles:
Extending A Link Between Social Influence Network Theory And Status Characteristics Theory
Reformulating a Link Between Social Influence Network Theory and Status Characteristics Theory
Linking Status Characteristics Theory with Social Influence Network Theory: Where the Weights Come From
Gift Exchange and Status Differences: An Experimental Test of Behavior-Status and Social Exchange Theories
|
|