All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"You Stupid, Lazy Kid": Perceptions of Verbal Aggressiveness in Older Adults
Unformatted Document Text:  12 The verbal aggression research indicates that individuals high in verbal aggressiveness perceive ambiguous messages more negatively than their counterparts low in aggressiveness. The research on self-awareness and expressions of verbal aggression also supports the hypothesis that individuals high in verbal aggressiveness will perceive verbal aggression more negatively and therefore activate more negative stereotypes than individuals low in verbal aggressiveness (Edwards, Bello, Brandau-Brown, & Hollems, 2001; Kinney, 1994; Kinney, Smith, Donzella, 2001). Hypothesis 1: High trait verbal aggressiveness will be positively correlated with negative stereotype activation. The stereotype activation research on the quality of contact on stereotype activation suggests that individuals with more positive interactions will have more positive stereotypes and fewer negative stereotypes available for activation. This research found that frequency was not a predictor of stereotype activation while quality was significantly related to stereotype activation (Fox & Giles, 1993; Pecchioni & Croghan, 2002). Hypothesis 2: Positive quality interactions with older adults will be positively correlated with positive stereotype and negatively correlated with negative stereotype activation, regardless of relational level or message strategy. CAT research on motivation with regard to nonapproximation strategies of tenor in discourse management and control is relevant to an examination of message strategy with regard to a specific individual. Verbal aggressiveness according to this research would be divergent and counterattuned and more likely to activate negative stereotypes. The research on attributions which found that individuals receiving verbally aggressive messages from outgroup members tended to account for this type of message production

Authors: Croghan, Jon. and Pecchioni, Loretta.
first   previous   Page 12 of 40   next   last



background image
12
The verbal aggression research indicates that individuals high in verbal
aggressiveness perceive ambiguous messages more negatively than their counterparts low
in aggressiveness. The research on self-awareness and expressions of verbal aggression
also supports the hypothesis that individuals high in verbal aggressiveness will perceive
verbal aggression more negatively and therefore activate more negative stereotypes than
individuals low in verbal aggressiveness (Edwards, Bello, Brandau-Brown, & Hollems,
2001; Kinney, 1994; Kinney, Smith, Donzella, 2001).
Hypothesis 1: High trait verbal aggressiveness will be positively correlated
with negative stereotype activation.
The stereotype activation research on the quality of contact on stereotype
activation suggests that individuals with more positive interactions will have more
positive stereotypes and fewer negative stereotypes available for activation. This research
found that frequency was not a predictor of stereotype activation while quality was
significantly related to stereotype activation (Fox & Giles, 1993; Pecchioni & Croghan,
2002).
Hypothesis 2: Positive quality interactions with older adults will be positively
correlated with positive stereotype and negatively correlated with
negative stereotype activation, regardless of relational level or
message strategy.
CAT research on motivation with regard to nonapproximation strategies of tenor
in discourse management and control is relevant to an examination of message strategy
with regard to a specific individual. Verbal aggressiveness according to this research
would be divergent and counterattuned and more likely to activate negative stereotypes.
The research on attributions which found that individuals receiving verbally aggressive
messages from outgroup members tended to account for this type of message production


Convention
Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote!
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 12 of 40   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.