All Academic, Inc. Research Logo

Info/CitationFAQResearchAll Academic Inc.
Document

"You Stupid, Lazy Kid": Perceptions of Verbal Aggressiveness in Older Adults
Unformatted Document Text:  15 Eighty-five (45.7%) of the respondents were male while 98 (52.7%) were female, and 3 (1.6%) did not respond. The average age of the participants was 20.1 years of age (sd = 1.47). The ethnic composition of the participants was 76.3% European American, 9.7% African American (which is slightly lower than the 11% campus-wide), 1.6 % Asian American, 0.5 Latino/a, 1.1% Native American (tribal membership not included), 3.3% responded as “other” (listing several ethnicities from the ethnicities included in the questionnaire), and 14 (7.5%) students did not respond to the question. One hundred and seventy-seven (95.2%) students were United States citizens. Instrumentation The three independent variables tested in the study are age of the sender, relational level, and message strategy. The questionnaire consists of three major parts. The first section is comprised of demographic questions about the research participants that assess: age, sex, ethnicity, and the quality and type of contact with age peers and older adults. The second section of the study assesses the participant’s trait verbal aggressiveness. Infante and Wigley’s (1986) Verbal Aggressiveness Scale consists of 20 items. The respondent’s trait verbal aggressiveness score is computed by recoding the negatively worded items and then summing the respondent’s scores on the 5-point Likert scale. Infante and Wigley found a reliability coefficient of .81 on the 20-item Verbal Aggressiveness questionnaire. For the current study the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale had an overall reliability across subjects of .85. The final section of the questionnaire asks the participants to imagine themselves in a scenario where three independent variables (age, relational level, and message

Authors: Croghan, Jon. and Pecchioni, Loretta.
first   previous   Page 15 of 40   next   last



background image
15
Eighty-five (45.7%) of the respondents were male while 98 (52.7%) were female,
and 3 (1.6%) did not respond. The average age of the participants was 20.1 years of age
(sd = 1.47). The ethnic composition of the participants was 76.3% European American,
9.7% African American (which is slightly lower than the 11% campus-wide), 1.6 %
Asian American, 0.5 Latino/a, 1.1% Native American (tribal membership not included),
3.3% responded as “other” (listing several ethnicities from the ethnicities included in the
questionnaire), and 14 (7.5%) students did not respond to the question. One hundred and
seventy-seven (95.2%) students were United States citizens.
Instrumentation
The three independent variables tested in the study are age of the sender,
relational level, and message strategy. The questionnaire consists of three major parts.
The first section is comprised of demographic questions about the research participants
that assess: age, sex, ethnicity, and the quality and type of contact with age peers and
older adults.
The second section of the study assesses the participant’s trait verbal
aggressiveness. Infante and Wigley’s (1986) Verbal Aggressiveness Scale consists of 20
items. The respondent’s trait verbal aggressiveness score is computed by recoding the
negatively worded items and then summing the respondent’s scores on the 5-point Likert
scale. Infante and Wigley found a reliability coefficient of .81 on the 20-item Verbal
Aggressiveness questionnaire. For the current study the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale had
an overall reliability across subjects of .85.
The final section of the questionnaire asks the participants to imagine themselves
in a scenario where three independent variables (age, relational level, and message


Convention
All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting.
Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf.
Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets!
Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more!
Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering.
Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more!
Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches!
Click here for more information.

first   previous   Page 15 of 40   next   last

©2008 All Academic, Inc.